Identification of pathways associated with invasive behavior by ovarian cancer cells using multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT)

Abstract

Proteomic profiling has emerged as a useful tool for identifying tissue alterations in disease states including malignant transformation. The aim of this study was to reveal expression profiles associated with the highly motile/invasive ovarian cancer cell phenotype. Six ovarian cancer cell lines were subjected to proteomic characterization using multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT), and evaluated for their motile/invasive behavior, so that these parameters could be compared. Within whole cell extracts of the ovarian cancer cells, MudPIT identified proteins that mapped to 2245 unique genes. Western blot analysis for selected proteins confirmed the expression profiles revealed by MudPIT, demonstrating the fidelity of this high-throughput analysis. Unsupervised cluster analysis partitioned the cell lines in a manner that reflected their motile/invasive capacity. A comparison of protein expression profiles between cell lines of high (group 1) versus low (group 2) motile/invasive capacity revealed 300 proteins that were differentially expressed, of which 196 proteins were significantly upregulated in group 1. Protein network and KEGG pathway analysis indicated a functional interplay between proteins up-regulated in group 1 cells, with increased expression of several key members of the actin cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix (ECM) and focal adhesion pathways. These proteomic expression profiles can be utilized to distinguish highly motile, aggressive ovarian cancer cells from lesser invasive ones, and could prove to be essential in the development of more effective strategies that target pivotal cell signaling pathways used by cancer cells during local invasion and distant metastasis.

Translational Analysis of Mouse and Human Placental Protein and mRNA Reveals Distinct Molecular Pathologies in Human Preeclampsia

“…We only accepted proteins identified with two unique peptides per analyzed sample type. To minimize protein inference, we developed a database-grouping scheme and only report proteins with substantial peptide information, as recently reported (14,19,20). This resulted in an estimated false discovery rate (FDR) of ϳ1.6% on the protein level (63 decoy proteins in the final data set).…”

“…To estimate and minimize our false positive rate the protein sequence database also contained every IPI protein sequence in its reversed amino acid orientation (target-decoy strategy; total sequences in the database, 102,958 IPI sequences plus bovine trypsin). A conservative false discovery rate was set to 0.5% on the peptide level, as recently described (14,19,20). Only fully tryptic peptides Ն7 amino acids matching these criteria were accepted to generate the final list of identified proteins.…”

Integrated Omic Analysis of Oropharyngeal Carcinomas Reveals Human Papillomavirus (HPV)–dependent Regulation of the Activator Protein 1 (AP-1) Pathway

“…Target/decoy searches were performed to experimentally estimate the protein false discovery rate, which was determined to be 1.3%. Protein identifications with at least two unique tryptic peptides were considered (23,24).…”

Challenges in cancer research and multifaceted approaches for cancer biomarker quest

“…Protein network modeling indicated a functional interplay between proteins up-regulated in group of high motile/invasive capacity cell lines characterised and increased expression of several key members of the actin cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix and focal adhesion pathways. These proteomic expression profiles could prove to be essential in the development of more effective strategies that target pivotal cell signalling pathways used by cancer cells during local invasion and distant metastasis [72].…”