2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/3545327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Partitions in a Homogeneous Activity Group Using Mobile Devices

Abstract: People in public areas often appear in groups. People with homogeneous coarse-grained activities may be further divided into subgroups depending on more fine-grained behavioral differences. Automatically identifying these subgroups can benefit a variety of applications for group members. In this work, we focus on identifying such subgroups in a homogeneous activity group (i.e., a group of people who perform the same coarse-grained activity at the same time). We present a generic framework using sensors built i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of comparing with the state of the art, it is difficult to provide a fair quantitative comparison (such as classification accuracy or algorithm performance) given that there is no widely accepted benchmark in the area of sensor-based group activity recognition. Most of the studies simulated their experiments and executed their proposed algorithms offline, e.g., [7,15,27,35], in which, challenges such as the inaccuracy caused by communication delay has been disregarded. Also, having domaindependent parameters can influence results, such as window size variations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of comparing with the state of the art, it is difficult to provide a fair quantitative comparison (such as classification accuracy or algorithm performance) given that there is no widely accepted benchmark in the area of sensor-based group activity recognition. Most of the studies simulated their experiments and executed their proposed algorithms offline, e.g., [7,15,27,35], in which, challenges such as the inaccuracy caused by communication delay has been disregarded. Also, having domaindependent parameters can influence results, such as window size variations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%