2017
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Novel Breast Cancer Risk Loci

Abstract: It has been estimated that >1,000 genetic loci have yet to be identified for breast cancer risk. Here we report the first study utilizing targeted next-generation sequencing to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) associated with breast cancer risk. Targeted sequencing of 283 genes was performed in 240 women with early-onset breast cancer (≤40 years) or a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Common coding variants with minor allele frequencies (MAF) >1% that were identified were presumed i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 32 ], were not found to be statistically significant with BC risk in our study, it is possible that some of these SNPs failed to reach statistical significance as our study could have had insufficient power to detect the associations and additional studies of Asian ancestry are thus warranted to confirm if these SNPs are significantly associated with BC risk. GWAS and other discovery methods could also be done on Asian populations to further identify novel ethnic-specific SNPs that could have more significant associations with BC risk in Asians [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 32 ], were not found to be statistically significant with BC risk in our study, it is possible that some of these SNPs failed to reach statistical significance as our study could have had insufficient power to detect the associations and additional studies of Asian ancestry are thus warranted to confirm if these SNPs are significantly associated with BC risk. GWAS and other discovery methods could also be done on Asian populations to further identify novel ethnic-specific SNPs that could have more significant associations with BC risk in Asians [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sample size of such study is likely to be significantly less than ExAC. Despite these limitations, the ExAC data has been commonly used and validated as an effective control dataset for estimating cancer risk for both known and newly discovered cancer predisposition genes/loci …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these limitations, the ExAC data has been commonly used and validated as an effective control dataset for estimating cancer risk for both known 15,[46][47][48] and newly discovered cancer predisposition genes/loci. 49,50 In summary, we conducted the largest WES study of hereditary OC to date and followed with a validation study to identify ANKRD11 and POLE as two possible OC predisposition genes. Identification of additional OC predisposition genes can potentiate ascertainment power and preventive care of individuals with high OC risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been accepted worldwide that breast cancer is a complex disease and consists of several intrinsic subtypes, which have different etiologies and prognosis [ 14 ]. By altering the related genes’ expression and/or function in key signaling pathways, we gradually realize putative SNPs may take effect on the basis of molecular subtypes, whether in risk or in clinical outcome of EBC [ 15 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%