2019
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole‐exome sequencing of ovarian cancer families uncovers putative predisposition genes

Abstract: Despite the identification of several ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition genes, a large proportion of familial OC risk remains unexplained. We adopted a two‐stage design to identify new OC predisposition genes. We first carried out a large germline whole‐exome sequencing study on 158 patients from 140 families with significant OC history, but without evidence of genetic predisposition due to BRCA1/2. We then evaluated the potential candidate genes in a large case–control association study involving 381 OC case… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Lu et al 20 interrogated WES data from Ambry Genetics for 2051 women with ovarian carcinoma for only a small number of known 'cancer-associated' genes, and demonstrated significant enrichment for variants in six genes (ATM, CHEK2, MSH6, PALB2, RAD51C and TP53). Recently, Zhu et al 21 analysed WES data from 158 BRCA1 and BRCA2-negative ovarian carcinoma cases and identified ANKRD11 and POLE as putative risk genes following validation studies. Neither gene was found to be enriched for LoF variants in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Lu et al 20 interrogated WES data from Ambry Genetics for 2051 women with ovarian carcinoma for only a small number of known 'cancer-associated' genes, and demonstrated significant enrichment for variants in six genes (ATM, CHEK2, MSH6, PALB2, RAD51C and TP53). Recently, Zhu et al 21 analysed WES data from 158 BRCA1 and BRCA2-negative ovarian carcinoma cases and identified ANKRD11 and POLE as putative risk genes following validation studies. Neither gene was found to be enriched for LoF variants in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to identify additional moderate-to-high-risk hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) genes have largely been restricted to candidate gene approaches using targeted nextgeneration sequencing (NGS) panels of known cancer predisposition genes [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] , which have collectively only resolved a very small proportion of unexplained families. Although three studies utilised data from whole-exome sequencing (WES) of BRCA1 and BRCA2-negative ovarian carcinoma patients [19][20][21] , these analysed only a subset of candidate genes in the available data and included non-HGSOC tumour types in their case cohorts. Others utilised germline sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [22][23][24][25] , but this approach is limited by the diverse technologies used to generate TCGA data along with the absence of any linked family history information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ERCC2 has been correlated with a more aggressive phenotype in head and neck tumors, the role of both proteins in OC is still unclear [ 114 ]. A higher somatic mutation burden has been recently reported in OC for the POLE gene, encoding for an enzyme involved in the DNA repair and replication; the impact of POLE mutations also seems to be more prominent in sporadic OC than in familiar one [ 115 ]. Upregulation of the RPA3 gene has been associated with HGSOC proliferation [ 116 ].…”
Section: Functional Pathways Affected By Oc Fitness Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work found that two genes— AKRD11 , a putative tumor suppressor, and POLE , a DNA repair and replication enzyme—predispose the development of ovarian cancer. Despite ongoing research to identify predisposing genes, a proportion of ovarian cancer risk cannot yet be fully explained [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%