1975
DOI: 10.1109/taes.1975.308179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Nonlinear Systems in Frequency Domain

Abstract: A frequency domain technique for identifying a class of nonlinear systems is presented. The class of nonlinear systems we consider in this paper consists of a power series nonlinearity sandwiched between two linear systems and the problem we address is one of identifying the transfer functions of the linear systems and the coefficients of the power series nonlinearity from the terminal behavior of the system. The identification procedure is based on a frequency domain model of the nonlinear system. The system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is called the “nonlinear AT model MoM Engine.” By dividing the input voltage V g (f) by the input current I g (f) in frequency domain, we derive the input impedance, Z(f). It is shown by Moosavi et al [2009] that so‐called NL‐AT engine, is a system with “mild” nonlinearity, so we can approximate its response by finding the transfer function Z(f), and being careful how we use the results [ Shanmugam and Jong , 1975; Billings and Tsang , 1989]. In step two of the procedure, first we need to assume an excitation current for the channel base, i DH (t), then determine a voltage source for the tower excitation, v DH (t)∣ z = H , which should produce the same current in the channel base.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is called the “nonlinear AT model MoM Engine.” By dividing the input voltage V g (f) by the input current I g (f) in frequency domain, we derive the input impedance, Z(f). It is shown by Moosavi et al [2009] that so‐called NL‐AT engine, is a system with “mild” nonlinearity, so we can approximate its response by finding the transfer function Z(f), and being careful how we use the results [ Shanmugam and Jong , 1975; Billings and Tsang , 1989]. In step two of the procedure, first we need to assume an excitation current for the channel base, i DH (t), then determine a voltage source for the tower excitation, v DH (t)∣ z = H , which should produce the same current in the channel base.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the results in Shanmugam and Jong [1975] these results are compared to the exact GFRFs, which yields that the results are very close to the true value. This follows from further computations which reveal that the maximum relative error equals 10 −7 when the GFRFs drop below −80 [dB] which is close to the computational precision.…”
Section: Lemma 3 (Polynomial Coefficients and Gfrf)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Using results from Shanmugam and Jong [1975], the GFRFs of PWH systems are an explicit function of the LTI dynamics G ± (ξ) and the polynomial coefficients α p . This result is later required for analysis and is summarized in the following lemma.…”
Section: Generalized Frequency Response Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful identification involves selection of parameters like sampling time and excitation signal and choice of a proper model structure. Several varieties of model structures have been proposed and discussed in the literatures [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Researchers have shown great interests in block oriented models.…”
Section: Glucose-insulin Interaction Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential advantage of using nonparametric model is that it can yield nonlinear model predictive control directly from the identified process [13]. The frequency domain analysis gives the nonlinear transfer function from the kernels itself [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%