2018
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of MEK162 as a Radiosensitizer for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

Abstract: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and lethal brain cancer type. PI3K and MAPK inhibitors have been studied preclinically in GBM as monotherapy, but not in combination with radiotherapy, which is a key component of the current standard treatment of GBM. In our study, GBM cell lines and patient representative primary cultures were grown as multicellular spheroids. Spheroids were treated with a panel of small-molecule drugs including MK2206, RAD001, BEZ235, MLN0128, and MEK162, alone and in combination wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite high drug loading efficacy of the nanocarriers (~ 40% at 50 µM loading concentration), the biological efficacy of encapsulated MEK162 in polymersomes was low compared with the free drug: 1 µM free MEK162 caused a large inhibition of spheroid growth, while MEK162 delivered via the nanocarriers was less effective. Previously, we showed that free MEK162 was synergistic to radiation [6], and this was not confirmed in the present study on the endpoint spheroid growth delay, with MEK162 delivered via polymersomes (cf. Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite high drug loading efficacy of the nanocarriers (~ 40% at 50 µM loading concentration), the biological efficacy of encapsulated MEK162 in polymersomes was low compared with the free drug: 1 µM free MEK162 caused a large inhibition of spheroid growth, while MEK162 delivered via the nanocarriers was less effective. Previously, we showed that free MEK162 was synergistic to radiation [6], and this was not confirmed in the present study on the endpoint spheroid growth delay, with MEK162 delivered via polymersomes (cf. Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…direct DNA damage induction by the methylating drug TMZ and inhibition of the MAPK signaling pathway by MEK162. Mechanistically, MAPK inhibition leads to down-regulation and dephosphorylation of the cell cycle checkpoint proteins CDK1/CDK2/WEE1 and of the DNA damage response proteins p-ATM/p-CHK2, finally inhibiting cell proliferation, which was demonstrated in a previous report from our laboratory [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the target box setup allowed us to anesthetize with isoflurane, position, and radiate up to 12 mice within 5 minutes. The target box has already proven its value in the identification of radiosensitizers for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors and glioblastoma [17,18], whilst the TBI box has been used in several studies, such as those for head-and-neck cancer [19]. In conclusion, the target box allows easy immobilization and positioning of the mice, the mice remain well controlled under anesthesia during the radiations, and both devices support accurate administration of the radiation dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also unclear how selective an AKT inhibitor needs to be, as the allosteric AKT inhibitor MK2206 produced sensitization to IR in glioblastoma cells that was independent of the p53 status. IR sensitization of glioblastoma was also observed with an inhibitor of the MAPK pathway, MEK162 or binimetinib, which downregulated and dephosphorylated the cell-cycle checkpoint proteins CDK1/CDK2/WEE1 and DNA damage response proteins phosphorylated ATM or CHK2 (2). When combined with IR, the MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib prolonged DNA damage and increased apoptosis probably by abrogating the G 2 -M checkpoint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%