2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcss.2022.3161305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Important Nodes in Multilayer Heterogeneous Networks Incorporating Multirelational Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, increasing attention has been paid to heterogeneous networks with multiple node and edge types. Wan et al first divided the heterogeneous network into core layers and auxiliary layers, calculated centrality scores and influence weights of nodes in each layer, and obtained key nodes in the core layer [4]. Soheila et al proposed the Entropy Ranking Method by considering neighbors, meta-path instances, and both combined, using their linear combination as node importance [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, increasing attention has been paid to heterogeneous networks with multiple node and edge types. Wan et al first divided the heterogeneous network into core layers and auxiliary layers, calculated centrality scores and influence weights of nodes in each layer, and obtained key nodes in the core layer [4]. Soheila et al proposed the Entropy Ranking Method by considering neighbors, meta-path instances, and both combined, using their linear combination as node importance [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, more and more researchers are turning to study key nodes identification in heterogeneous networks. Some recent work has tried hierarchical modeling [4] or extracting multiple meta-path instances [5] in heterogeneous networks to measure node importance. However, these methods overlook the varied influence probabilities between different node pairs, leading to unsatisfactory performance in identifying key nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilayer networks are more suitable than single-layer networks for capturing complex interactions in the spatio-temporal dimension (Wan et al, 2022). In the financial field, a bipartite multilayer network focusing on centrality measurement was used for risk monitoring, and the model achieved excellent risk prediction performance by studying the nonlinear correlation of variables (Óskarsd ottir and Bravo, 2021).…”
Section: Studies On Multilayer Network In Crisis Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilayer networks are more suitable than single-layer networks for capturing complex interactions in the spatio-temporal dimension (Wan et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wan et al, utilized multiple relationships and global network topology features in complex networks and classified heterogeneous nodes into core and auxiliary layers based on the node type. They quantified the importance of the auxiliary layer by determining the weighted interlayer influence based on different levels of connectivity, thereby measuring the importance of core layer nodes [17]. However, structural holes mainly analyze nodes from the perspective of local information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%