2009
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01850-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Staphylococcus Species Directly from Positive Blood Culture Broth by Use of Molecular and Conventional Methods

Abstract: We compared two real-time PCR assays (both by the use of melting curve analysis) for their ability to identify Staphylococcus species directly from 200 positive blood culture bottles. The PCR assays correctly identified 83% to 94% of the Staphylococcus isolates to species clusters. Molecular testing significantly outperformed commercially available latex tests (sensitivity for both latex tests, <15%) when it was used directly with broth from signal-positive blood cultures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, automatic rapid systems require 3.5 h for bacterial identification, versus only 20 min for MALDI-TOF-MS. PCR-based techniques have been used for bacterial identification directly from blood culture broth. Some methods require the use of specific targets (8,19,20,24). Despite the fact that these techniques are sensitive, they remain expensive and are specific for one or a few pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, automatic rapid systems require 3.5 h for bacterial identification, versus only 20 min for MALDI-TOF-MS. PCR-based techniques have been used for bacterial identification directly from blood culture broth. Some methods require the use of specific targets (8,19,20,24). Despite the fact that these techniques are sensitive, they remain expensive and are specific for one or a few pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogens with fastidious growth requirements and those difficult to identify by phenotypic methods require more time for identification. Rapid nucleic acid amplification methods such as real-time PCR using melting curve analysis, multiplex PCR, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and peptide nucleic acid-FISH (PNA-FISH) have been used to detect pathogens in blood cultures including Staphylococcus aureus , Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans [6] , [7] , [8] . These assays, however, only target specific organisms; require technical expertise; and specimens are usually processed in batches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fastest possible identification of Staphylococcus aureus and its differentiation from coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are essential for optimal treatment of infected patients (Ruimy et al, 2008;Weinstein, 2003). Conventional phenotypic tests are not sufficiently reliable when applied directly to blood cultures (Chapin & Musgnug, 2003;Mehta et al, 2009;Speers et al, 1998). A wide variety of molecular methods are available, but most are rather complex (Mehta et al, 2009;Ruimy et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional phenotypic tests are not sufficiently reliable when applied directly to blood cultures (Chapin & Musgnug, 2003;Mehta et al, 2009;Speers et al, 1998). A wide variety of molecular methods are available, but most are rather complex (Mehta et al, 2009;Ruimy et al, 2008). A relatively easy and costeffective molecular method for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with either oligonucleotides of DNA (Gescher et al, 2008;Jansen et al, 2000;Kempf et al, 2000;Peters et al, 2006;Tavares et al, 2008) or peptide nucleic acid (PNA) (Chapin & Musgnug, 2003;Forrest et al, 2006;González et al, 2004;Hartmann et al, 2005;Hensley et al, 2009;Ly et al, 2008;Oliveira et al, 2002Oliveira et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%