Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a novel method for the direct identification of bacteria from blood culture broths. We evaluate for the first time, the performance of the MALDI Sepsityper™ Kit and MS for the identification of bacteria compared to standard phenotypic methods using the manufacturer's specified bacterial identification criteria (spectral scores ≥1.700–1.999 and ≥2.000 indicated identification to genus and species level, respectively). Five hundred and seven positive blood culture broths were prospectively examined, of which 379 (74.8%; 358 monomicrobial, 21 polymicrobial) were identified by MALDI-TOF MS; 195 (100%) and 132 (67.7%) of 195 gram-positive; and 163 (100%) and 149 (91.4%) of 163 gram-negative organisms from monomicrobial blood cultures were correctly identified to genus and species level, respectively. Spectral scores <1.700 (no identification) were obtained in 128/507 (25.2%) positive blood culture broths, including 31.6% and 32.3% of gram-positive and polymicrobial blood cultures, respectively. Significantly more gram-negative organisms were identified compared to gram-positive organisms at species level (p<0.0001). Five blood cultures were misidentified, but at species level only; including four monomicrobial blood cultures with Streptococcus oralis/mitis that were misidentified as Streptococcus pneumoniae. Positive predictive values for the direct identification of both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria from monomicrobial blood culture broths to genus level were 100%. A diagnostic algorithm for positive blood culture broths that incorporates gram staining and MALDI-TOF MS should identify the majority of pathogens, particularly to genus level.

The identification of Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures is clinically relevant, but it requires a test that is both rapid and reliable. Previously, biochemical, immunological, tube coagulase, and thermostable-endonuclease methods have shown variable sensitivity and specificity. Testing directly from blood culture broth has not been described for the latex kit Staphaurex Plus (Murex Diagnostics Ltd.), and the modified conventional tests have not been used with the newer, continuously monitored blood culture systems. In addition, the commercial RAPIDEC staph kit (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc.) has been used to detect S. aureus directly from the Vital blood culture system (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), but its performance has not been evaluated with other continuously monitored systems. A total of 201 clinical blood cultures (BACTEC 9240 culture system; Johnston Laboratories, Inc.) in which a Gram stain showed gram-positive cocci resembling staphylococci were evaluated prospectively. The Staphaurex Plus kit, the tube coagulase test, the thermostable-endonuclease test, and the RAPIDEC staph kit were compared. The sensitivities were 23, 92, 85, and 98% and the specificities were 99, 100, 93, and 100%, respectively. The RAPIDEC staph kit was the most reliable test, with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of the best published results for any of the rapid tests. However, it was the most expensive of the tests and relatively labor-intensive. The tube coagulase test was also sensitive, the simplest to perform, and inexpensive.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing with the BD Phoenix system on bacterial cell pellets generated from blood culture broths using the Bruker MALDI Sepsityper kit was evaluated. Seventy-six Gram-negative isolates, including 12 with defined multi-resistant phenotypes, had antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) performed by Phoenix on the cell pellet in parallel with conventional methods. In total, 1414/1444 (97.9 %) of susceptibility tests were concordant, with only 1 (0.07 %) very major error. This novel method has the potential to reduce the turnaround time for AST results by up to a day for Gram-negative bacteraemias.

No abstract