2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Factors Related to Trust Formation in Construction Supply Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another respondent remarked: “trust is defined as your partner delivering with agreed quality … they deliver in the agreed time”. The results confirmed the findings of previous studies (Nicolaou and McKnight, 2006; Ryciuk, 2017), which defined trust as honesty and integrity. Another respondent noted: “we have to get from the vendor what we want”, which implies that trust can be defined as competency, keeping commitments, the ability to do what the partner needs to be done and fulfilling promised responsibilities properly.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another respondent remarked: “trust is defined as your partner delivering with agreed quality … they deliver in the agreed time”. The results confirmed the findings of previous studies (Nicolaou and McKnight, 2006; Ryciuk, 2017), which defined trust as honesty and integrity. Another respondent noted: “we have to get from the vendor what we want”, which implies that trust can be defined as competency, keeping commitments, the ability to do what the partner needs to be done and fulfilling promised responsibilities properly.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Levels of trust can be classified as weak, semi strong and strong. Therefore, trust is defined as a willingness to expose yourself to risk (Ryciuk, 2017). In sociological research, trust entails the effect of history, culture and organizations on humans in a particular social context.…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Trust Definition and Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [36], trust is a pre-requisite for a mutual, interdependent, and beneficial relationship where both parties are committed to each other's long-term interests or benefits. Ryciuk [37] defined inter-organizational trust as an uncertain situation in which one relies on the partner and hopes that the partner will not develop opportunistic behaviors. They argued that trust does not exist when future events are certain and under control.…”
Section: Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason why subordinates usually adopt certain behaviors to please their superiors. On the other hand, superiors, who are more concerned about organizational performance (Ryciuk, 2017), may excessively monitor or control the behavior of their subordinates, eroding trust (Brewer and Strahorn, 2012). According to previous studies (Gabarro, 1978;Pfeffer, 1992;Tyler and Lind, Interorganizational trust asymmetry behavior 1992), in this paper, the authors define the "upward-trust behavior" as when "the subordinate makes more effort to constitute and maintain the trust relationship than the superior because of adverse market status" and the "downward-trust behavior" as "the superior's behavior based on their expectations of the subordinate generated from previous knowledge of or investigation into the subordinate's capacity, attitude, and performance.…”
Section: Vertical Trust and Trust Asymmetry Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%