Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Advancements in Social Signal Processing for Multimodal Interaction 2016
DOI: 10.1145/3005467.3005469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of emergent leaders in a meeting scenario using multiple kernel learning

Abstract: In this paper, an effective framework for detection of emergent leaders in small group is presented. In this scope, the combination of different types of nonverbal visual features; the visual focus of attention, head activity and body activity based features are utilized. Using them together ensued significant results. For the first time, multiple kernel learning (MKL) was applied for the identification of the most and the least emergent leaders. Taking the advantage of MKL's capability to use different kernel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas existing evidence implies that individual predispositions affect the way leadership is perceived and rated (e.g., Keller Hansbrough et al, 2015), information processing theories of leadership (Lord, 1985; Lord et al, 1982; Lord & Maher, 1993) propose that individuals have specific expectations and attitudes toward leadership that influence both the interpersonal behavior and the perception of behavior in team collaborations. Through communication behavior, the team members exchange information (Beyan et al, 2016) on relevant knowledge, competence, which should form the basis for decisions on whom to grant influence within the team (Anderson & Kilduff, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas existing evidence implies that individual predispositions affect the way leadership is perceived and rated (e.g., Keller Hansbrough et al, 2015), information processing theories of leadership (Lord, 1985; Lord et al, 1982; Lord & Maher, 1993) propose that individuals have specific expectations and attitudes toward leadership that influence both the interpersonal behavior and the perception of behavior in team collaborations. Through communication behavior, the team members exchange information (Beyan et al, 2016) on relevant knowledge, competence, which should form the basis for decisions on whom to grant influence within the team (Anderson & Kilduff, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated detection of emergent leadership is raising interest in the organizational environment as it has been related to the improvement of team productivity and performance [46]. Several datasets were collected to study such an emergent state (e.g., ELEA [43], PAVIS [7]) and used by several studies (e.g., [5,8,39]). Since nonverbal features have been found to be more informative than verbal features for the analysis of social phenomena (e.g., [1,29]) computational studies addressing the automated detection of emergent leadership used nonverbal features (e.g., [6,43]).…”
Section: Computational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and build up memory representations about these events" (Malle & Pearce, 2001, p. 278), which leads to the generation and processing of information (Lichtenstein et al, 2007;Lord, 1985;Marion et al, 2016). Social interactions provide social information as they include verbal and nonverbal communication (e.g., eye gaze, head-body orientation, facial expression) between a sender and an observer (Beyan, Capozzi, Becchio, & Murino, 2016). The availability of such social information is crucial, as perceivers make their leadership judgments through a retrospective social-cognitive evaluation process (Lord, Day, Zaccaro, Avolio, & Eagly, 2017).…”
Section: How Do Leadership Perceptions Change? Social Interactions Asmentioning
confidence: 99%