2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-010-0620-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of aquifer and well parameters from step-drawdown tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Well performance can be evaluated using the well efficiency before and after surging. Many methods for the evaluation of well efficiency have been developed and reported in the literature [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], but in this study, well efficiency was evaluated using Jacob's [22] and Rorabaugh's model [26]. Well efficiency is the ratio between the theoretical drawdown of the aquifer to the actual drawdown of the well [16,17].…”
Section: Step Drawdown Test and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well performance can be evaluated using the well efficiency before and after surging. Many methods for the evaluation of well efficiency have been developed and reported in the literature [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], but in this study, well efficiency was evaluated using Jacob's [22] and Rorabaugh's model [26]. Well efficiency is the ratio between the theoretical drawdown of the aquifer to the actual drawdown of the well [16,17].…”
Section: Step Drawdown Test and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the equality of function limits will be satisfied. Equations (23) and (24) provide knowledge about the possibility of the following relationship:…”
Section: Full Compensation Of Well Ageingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is based on taking the derivative of the drawdown with respect to time for the entire pumping test period, eliminating the constant well-loss terms. The conducted tests showed that the method allows the generation of the aquifer function B(t) for the entire duration of the step-drawdown test [24]. The choice of the model is the most difficult choice that the analyst of such a hydraulic test has to make since a wrong model can only lead to the wrong conclusions and failure of the borehole [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El caudal de extracción es entonces incrementado hasta que un nuevo estado cuasi-estacionario es alcanzado y el procedimiento se repite para caudales adicionales. Estas pruebas de caudal escalonado (step-drawdown tests), también conocidas como aforos, permiten estimar los parámetros K y S s del acuífero y, además, evaluar las pérdidas de carga no lineales que son necesarias para la selección del caudal de operación del pozo (Rorabaugh, 1953;Avci, 1992;Kruseman y De Rider, 1994;Kawecki, 1995;Batu, 1998;Jha et al, 2006;Shekhar, 2006;Louwyck et al, 2010;Mathias y Todman, 2010;Avci et al, 2010).…”
Section: Métodosunclassified