2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1537-5110(03)00066-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Prioritisation of Critical Sub-watersheds for Soil Conservation Management using the SWAT Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
101
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
101
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives the model strong potential for use in scenario studies of changing land-use and management conditions (e.g. Tripathi et al 2003, Mishra et al 2007, Parajuli et al 2008, Rostamian et al 2008, Hunink et al 2013.…”
Section: © 2013 Iahs Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives the model strong potential for use in scenario studies of changing land-use and management conditions (e.g. Tripathi et al 2003, Mishra et al 2007, Parajuli et al 2008, Rostamian et al 2008, Hunink et al 2013.…”
Section: © 2013 Iahs Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, a number of hydrological models (e.g., MIKE SHE, AGNPS, and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)) have been developed [4,[17][18][19] to simulate water flow and sediment transport at the river-basin scale. The current study uses SWAT, a process-based hydrological model, developed by the USDA, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), which can be applied to large ungauged basins [20][21][22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly used to simulate water and soil loss in small agricultural watersheds (Tripathi et al, 2003). Neitsch et al (2001) Srinivasan et al (1998) reviewed the SWAT model simulation and application for streamflow, sediment, and nutrient transport along with the effects of management practices.…”
Section: Swat Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%