2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and characterization of abamectin resistance in Tetranychus urticae Koch populations from greenhouses in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of the Turkish strains harbored any of the reported abamectin resistance mutations. Similarly, previous studies did also not detect these mutations in Turkish populations (Ilias et al 2014;Çağatay et al 2018), despite the high resistance levels to abamectin (Çağatay et al 2018). Abamectin resistance mutations were not frequently observed in various strains collected from 27 countries (Ilias et al 2014) and mutations were also not found in 26 strains from Washington, USA (Piraneo et al 2015), wheras it has been reported as more common in seven strains from China (Xu et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, none of the Turkish strains harbored any of the reported abamectin resistance mutations. Similarly, previous studies did also not detect these mutations in Turkish populations (Ilias et al 2014;Çağatay et al 2018), despite the high resistance levels to abamectin (Çağatay et al 2018). Abamectin resistance mutations were not frequently observed in various strains collected from 27 countries (Ilias et al 2014) and mutations were also not found in 26 strains from Washington, USA (Piraneo et al 2015), wheras it has been reported as more common in seven strains from China (Xu et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, a recent study showed that resistance mutations (individually or a combination of both mutations) to abamectin do not confer high level of resistance on their own (Riga et al 2017). Contribution of resistance mechanisms other than target-site mutations seems also to play major role in abamectin resistance as previously reported (Stumpf and Nauen 2002;Khajehali et al 2011, Riga et al 2014Çağatay et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It must be noted, however, that even with this approach, the observed resistance ratios among different strains vs. the control vary from 1.69 to 2.32 at the maximum (Table 2). While such ratios are statistically significant, they only represent a small fraction of observable abamectin resistance in the field [11,17,[59][60][61]. This fact either represents an inherent limitation of the Drosophila model in order to fully recapitulate the field conditions (also relevant in the assessment of target-site resistance [42]) or reflects the synergistic action of multiple molecular mechanisms in resistant pest populations, perhaps involving target-site abamectin resistance [14], in order to generate the resistant phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hominis [72], and the vegetable leafminer, Liriomyza sativae [73]. In T. urticae and R. microplus, CYP, GST, and esterase enzymes were all shown to be linked to abamectin or ivermectin resistance [28,33,74,75]. Clearly, macrocyclic lactone detoxification can involve different enzymes depending upon the species and in many instances, overexpression of these genes has been linked to resistance to other insecticides as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%