2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and assessment of ecosystem services for protected area planning: A case in rural communities of Wuyishan national park pilot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies mention the need for integration of conservation programs to adjust policies and management strategies [2,9]. National Park Management requires an integrated planning approach based on transdisciplinary research and the involvement of all stakeholders [10] and institutional management must consider strategic planning in regulations to address the diversity of demands to achieve conservation goals [11]. Good local government has the authority to intervene in achieving the objectives of social justice and protection of conservation areas [12], although institutional changes limit governance adaptation and have removed the sense of responsibility for maintaining national park resources [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similar studies mention the need for integration of conservation programs to adjust policies and management strategies [2,9]. National Park Management requires an integrated planning approach based on transdisciplinary research and the involvement of all stakeholders [10] and institutional management must consider strategic planning in regulations to address the diversity of demands to achieve conservation goals [11]. Good local government has the authority to intervene in achieving the objectives of social justice and protection of conservation areas [12], although institutional changes limit governance adaptation and have removed the sense of responsibility for maintaining national park resources [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Human capital has a variety of aspects, such as educational level, health, and labor force proportion [13]. Since health is hard to quantify in a social survey, and while age and educational level (Edu) may influence local communities' perceptions of ecosystem services [12], we focused on the age and educational level of the respondents for estimating human capital. Cropland and farmland are two major natural resources for residents, and thus, we used per-capita cropland area (PCA) and per-capita forest area (PFA) to reflect the natural capital.…”
Section: System Formulation and Causality Derivation With Qualitativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first grouped the value of each livelihood indicator. "Age" and "educational level" were grouped according to commonly used statistical methods [12]; "annual per-capita income" and "annual household income" were also grouped referring to related articles [12,13] with slight modifications to fit the actuality in the study area, while the other livelihood indicators (PCA and PFA) were grouped using a clustering method. According to the results of grouping, we selected groups with the highest and lowest values of each indicator for MCA analysis (e.g., the groups "young" and "senior" refer to the indicators of "age" valued the lowest and highest, respectively, while "EduH" and "EduL" refer to the indicators of "educational level" valued the highest and lowest, respectively).…”
Section: System Output and Hypothesis Verification With Nexus Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations