2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Ideal” decision-making processes for transport planning: A comparison between Europe and South East Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this charging would be opposed by the public, particularly motorcycle and car users who are the majority (about 80%). Thus, the public participation process and educational programs on sustainable transport development should be implemented together with the transport planning process [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this charging would be opposed by the public, particularly motorcycle and car users who are the majority (about 80%). Thus, the public participation process and educational programs on sustainable transport development should be implemented together with the transport planning process [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information regarding the BIdeal Decision Making Process^and its application can be found in [22][23][24].…”
Section: The Bideal Decision Making Process^(idmp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the initial planning of this system did not refer to its potential demand, as it only serves one-third of the potential demand [24]. Difficulties in the quality of data due to fast growth situation in cities in developing countries hinder the effective planning since the accurate model heavily based on the data availability [25]. However, the vision-led decision-making such as in BRT Jakarta faces many problems when the leader is out of office.…”
Section: The Implementation Process Of Brt Jakartamentioning
confidence: 99%