2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICTs and time-span in technical efficiency gains. A stochastic frontier approach over a panel of Italian manufacturing firms

Abstract: This paper, in contrast to much of the existing literature, which focuses on the impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on labour productivity, assesses the relationship between ICTs investments and Technical Efficiency (TE) using a stochastic frontier approach. We use a large panel dataset of Italian manufacturing firms over the period [1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005][2006] and confirm prior findings of the existing literature on ICT and productivity. In a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasan (2002) and Basu and Das (2015) suggested that in medium and short run, use of technology is the most important determinant of corporate profitability and efficiency in the Indian organized manufacturing sector. Some of the other important factors identified by different research studies were size of the firm, age of the firm, ownership structure, number of employees, profitability, prevalence of competition, liberalisation, exports, labour cost, foreign ownership, capitalisation, subsidies, management costs, education of the owners, quality of human capital, , R & D, innovation, existence of crimes and political risk, infrastructure, product diversification and international diversification, use of technology, managerial efficiency, remuneration of the top management and workers, market to book value ratio, financial leverage, early adoption of technology, governance quality, government grants and assistance, rate of taxes, foreign investment and training cost of employees (Baek & Neymotin, 2016;Blomström, 1986;Biener et al, 2016;Castiglione & Infante, 2014;Chapelle & Plane, 2005;Chuang & Lin, 1999;Diaz-Balteiro et al, 2006;Doaei et al, 2015;Firth et al, 2015;Forlani, 2012;Giokas et al, 2015;Hanousek et al ,2015;Ismail & Sulaiman, 2007;Jain et al, 2015;Kumbhakar et al, 1991;O'Toole and Tarp, 2014;Piesse & Thirtle, 2000;Pitt & Lee, 1981;Thatcher & Oliver, 2001;Weill, 1992;Yu et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2003;Zheng et al, 1998). Amongst all factors, ownership (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasan (2002) and Basu and Das (2015) suggested that in medium and short run, use of technology is the most important determinant of corporate profitability and efficiency in the Indian organized manufacturing sector. Some of the other important factors identified by different research studies were size of the firm, age of the firm, ownership structure, number of employees, profitability, prevalence of competition, liberalisation, exports, labour cost, foreign ownership, capitalisation, subsidies, management costs, education of the owners, quality of human capital, , R & D, innovation, existence of crimes and political risk, infrastructure, product diversification and international diversification, use of technology, managerial efficiency, remuneration of the top management and workers, market to book value ratio, financial leverage, early adoption of technology, governance quality, government grants and assistance, rate of taxes, foreign investment and training cost of employees (Baek & Neymotin, 2016;Blomström, 1986;Biener et al, 2016;Castiglione & Infante, 2014;Chapelle & Plane, 2005;Chuang & Lin, 1999;Diaz-Balteiro et al, 2006;Doaei et al, 2015;Firth et al, 2015;Forlani, 2012;Giokas et al, 2015;Hanousek et al ,2015;Ismail & Sulaiman, 2007;Jain et al, 2015;Kumbhakar et al, 1991;O'Toole and Tarp, 2014;Piesse & Thirtle, 2000;Pitt & Lee, 1981;Thatcher & Oliver, 2001;Weill, 1992;Yu et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2003;Zheng et al, 1998). Amongst all factors, ownership (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive relationship between age and efficiency can be expected due to "learning by doing" processes, which occur through production experience. Evidence of this for Italy is in [15] [18]. However, others show that younger firms generally adopt new innovation easily, while older firms delay adoption as it may be too costly to substitute old methods, thus implying that efficiency may decrease with age [13].…”
Section: The Empirical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output is measured by the value of firm sales, labour is represented by the number of employees, while the physical capital is gauged by the sum of fixed and immaterial assets. These choices are widely shared by scholars using firm-data level and, especially, by those referring to the same data-source[14]-[18] 3. In the Pavitt taxonomy, sectors are classified as supplier dominated (Pavitt 1), scale intensive (Pavitt 2), specialized supplier (Pavitt 3) and science based (Pavitt 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies on the effect of ICT (see , Table 2). Empirical evidence establishes a positive link between ICT and technical efficiency (Brasini & Freo, 2012;Castiglione,2012;Castiglione & Infante, 2014;Dimelis & Papaioannou, 2010;Berghall, 2014;Bechetti et al2003;Lee & Barua,1999;Romero & Rodriguez, 2010;Repkine,2008;Bertschek, Fryges & Kaiser, 2006;Criscuolo & Waldron, 2003;Rincon, Robinson & Vecchi, 2005). Milana & Zeli (2002) and Repkine (2009) have found no significant effect of ICT on firm efficiency.…”
Section: Software Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ICT is considered as a general purpose factor, ICT investment could also facilitate firm efficiency. Castiglione & Infante (2014) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%