Abstract:I n 2014, ibrutinib was made available for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. The UK Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Forum collected data from UK/Ireland patients with a minimum of 1 year follow-up with pre-planned primary endpoints; the number of patients still on therapy at 1 year "discontinuation-free survival" and 1 year overall survival. With a median of 16 months follow up, data on 315 patients demonstrated a 1 year discontinuation-free survival of 73.7% and a 1 year overall surviva… Show more
“…The present analyses focus on patients with early incomplete adherence and possibly represents a group that is at greater risk of poor adherence and subsequent poor outcomes. Despite our results and those obtained within the context of a clinical trial 3 demonstrating transient disease progression related to temporary dose holds, this appears to be reversible with re-initation of therapy 16 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This would suggest that the ideal treatment strategy would be to recommend initiation of therapy at standard dosing and interruption as needed as directed in the FDA label. Two studies have reported no negative impact for patients requiring dose reductions 16, 17 , however differences may be attributable to population differences and timing of reductions. The present analyses focus on patients with early incomplete adherence and possibly represents a group that is at greater risk of poor adherence and subsequent poor outcomes.…”
Background:
As oral targeted agents, such as ibrutinib, become more widely used understanding the impact of suboptimal dosing on overall and progression-free survival outside of clinical trials is imperative.
Methods:
Data on ibrutinib discontinuation, dose reductions and treatment interruptions were collected on 170 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL n=115, 64%) patients treated with ibrutinib at a single institution. Ibrutinib dose adherence was calculated as the proportion of days in which ibrutinib was administered out of the total number of days ibrutinib was prescribed in the first 8 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare conditional survival outcomes beyond 8 weeks in patients ≥80% dose adherence and patients <80% dose adherence.
Results:
Median overall survival among those that discontinued for progression was poor (n=51, 1.7 months, 95%CI 0.3–3.7). Lower dose adherence (<80%) was associated with significantly worse progression-free (p=0.002) and overall survival (p=0.024). However, among CLL patients, lower dose adherence was only associated with worse progression-free survival (p=0.043). Patients with early dose reductions had significant worse PFS (p=0.004) and OS (p=0.014). Patients with dose interruptions lasting > 1 week had worse PFS (p=0.047) but not OS (p=0.577).
Conclusion:
In this observational study, NHL and CLL patients demonstrated poor outcomes after discontinuing ibrutinib for disease progression. The inferior survival related to suboptimal dose adherence of ibrutinib was predominantly due to early dose reduction. These data confirm poor survival in CLL and lymphoma patients alike after ibrutinib discontinuation and support recommendations for full dose at treatment initiation.
“…The present analyses focus on patients with early incomplete adherence and possibly represents a group that is at greater risk of poor adherence and subsequent poor outcomes. Despite our results and those obtained within the context of a clinical trial 3 demonstrating transient disease progression related to temporary dose holds, this appears to be reversible with re-initation of therapy 16 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This would suggest that the ideal treatment strategy would be to recommend initiation of therapy at standard dosing and interruption as needed as directed in the FDA label. Two studies have reported no negative impact for patients requiring dose reductions 16, 17 , however differences may be attributable to population differences and timing of reductions. The present analyses focus on patients with early incomplete adherence and possibly represents a group that is at greater risk of poor adherence and subsequent poor outcomes.…”
Background:
As oral targeted agents, such as ibrutinib, become more widely used understanding the impact of suboptimal dosing on overall and progression-free survival outside of clinical trials is imperative.
Methods:
Data on ibrutinib discontinuation, dose reductions and treatment interruptions were collected on 170 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL n=115, 64%) patients treated with ibrutinib at a single institution. Ibrutinib dose adherence was calculated as the proportion of days in which ibrutinib was administered out of the total number of days ibrutinib was prescribed in the first 8 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare conditional survival outcomes beyond 8 weeks in patients ≥80% dose adherence and patients <80% dose adherence.
Results:
Median overall survival among those that discontinued for progression was poor (n=51, 1.7 months, 95%CI 0.3–3.7). Lower dose adherence (<80%) was associated with significantly worse progression-free (p=0.002) and overall survival (p=0.024). However, among CLL patients, lower dose adherence was only associated with worse progression-free survival (p=0.043). Patients with early dose reductions had significant worse PFS (p=0.004) and OS (p=0.014). Patients with dose interruptions lasting > 1 week had worse PFS (p=0.047) but not OS (p=0.577).
Conclusion:
In this observational study, NHL and CLL patients demonstrated poor outcomes after discontinuing ibrutinib for disease progression. The inferior survival related to suboptimal dose adherence of ibrutinib was predominantly due to early dose reduction. These data confirm poor survival in CLL and lymphoma patients alike after ibrutinib discontinuation and support recommendations for full dose at treatment initiation.
“…In a real‐world study of ibrutinib‐treated patients enrolled in a compassionate‐use programme, the estimated 10‐month PFS and OS rates were 71% and 78%, respectively, for 50 patients with del(17p) (Winqvist et al , 2016). In a real‐world study of ibrutinib‐treated patients in a named patient scheme, the estimated 12‐month discontinuation‐free progression and OS rates were 71% and 84%, respectively for 90 patients with del(17p) (UK CLL Forum 2016). Together, the results of these clinical trials and real‐world analyses support the conclusion that ibrutinib is among the most active agents yet developed for the treatment of del(17p) CLL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the initial study, many more patients with del(17p) CLL have been treated with ibrutinib, including in real‐world settings (Mato et al , 2016, UK CLL Forum 2016; Winqvist et al , 2016). To provide a more robust description of outcomes in the prospective trials in this important high‐risk patient population, we conducted a combined analysis of 243 patients with R/R del(17p) CLL who received treatment with single‐agent ibrutinib (420 mg) in 1 of 3 prospective clinical studies (Byrd et al , 2013, 2014, 2015; O'Brien et al , 2014, 2016a).…”
SummaryPatients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) with deletion 17p [del(17p)] have poor outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy. Ibrutinib is indicated for the treatment of CLL/SLL, including del(17p) CLL/SLL, and allows for treatment without chemotherapy. This integrated analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes in 230 patients with relapsed/refractory del(17p) CLL/SLL from three ibrutinib studies. With a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1–12), 18% and 79% of evaluable patients had del(11q) or unmutated IGHV, respectively. With a median follow‐up of 28 months, overall response rate was 85% and estimated 30‐month progression‐free and overall survival rates were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50–64] and 69% (95% CI 61–75), respectively. Patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase or no bulky disease had the most favourable survival outcomes. Sustained haematological improvements in haemoglobin, platelet count and absolute neutrophil count occurred in 61%, 67% and 70% of patients with baseline cytopenias, respectively. New onset severe cytopenias and infections decreased in frequency over time. Progression‐free and overall survival with ibrutinib surpass those of other therapies for patients with del(17p) CLL/SLL. These results provide further evidence of the robust clinical activity of ibrutinib in difficult‐to‐treat CLL/SLL populations.
“…Despite, the well characterized toxicity profile of the drug, analysis of clinical trials and real-world data revealed that in particular patient cohorts, up to approximately 30% patients discontinue ibrutinib therapy due to toxicity [57,61,62,[73][74][75][76]].…”
Ibrutinib is the first Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, which showed significant clinical activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) patients regardless of cytogenetic risk factors. Recent results of phase III clinical trials in treatment-naïve CLL patients shift the importance of the agent to frontline therapy. Nevertheless, beside its clinical efficacy, ibrutinib possesses some off-target activity resulting in ibrutinib-characteristic adverse events including bleeding diathesis and arrhythmias. Furthermore, acquired and primary resistance to the drug have been described. As the use of ibrutinib in clinical practice increases, the problem of resistance is becoming apparent, and new methods of overcoming this clinical problem arise. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of BTK inhibitors' resistance and discuss the post-ibrutinib treatment options.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.