Venetoclax is a BCL2 inhibitor approved for 17p-deleted relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia with activity following kinase inhibitors. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with venetoclax to describe outcomes, toxicities, and treatment selection following venetoclax discontinuation. A total of 141 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients were included (98% relapsed/refractory). Median age at venetoclax initiation was 67 years (range 37-91), median prior therapies was 3 (0-11), 81% unmutated IGHV, 45% del(17p), and 26.8% complex karyotype (≥ 3 abnormalities). Prior to venetoclax initiation, 89% received a B-cell receptor antagonist. For tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis, 93% received allopurinol, 92% normal saline, and 45% rasburicase. Dose escalation to the maximum recommended dose of 400 mg daily was achieved in 85% of patients. Adverse events of interest included neutropenia in 47.4%, thrombocytopenia in 36%, tumor lysis syndrome in 13.4%, neutropenic fever in 11.6%, and diarrhea in 7.3%. The overall response rate to venetoclax was 72% (19.4% complete remission). With a median follow up of 7 months, median progression free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort have not been reached. To date, 41 venetoclax treated patients have discontinued therapy and 24 have received a subsequent therapy, most commonly ibrutinib. In the largest clinical experience of venetoclax-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, the majority successfully completed and maintained a maximum recommended dose. Response rates and duration of response appear comparable to clinical trial data. Venetoclax was active in patients with mutations known to confer ibrutinib resistance. Optimal sequencing of newer chronic lymphocytic leukemia therapies requires further study.

Purpose Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is an important clinical problem in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Nationwide longitudinal studies are needed to understand the trajectory and severity of CRCI in specific cognitive domains. Patients and Methods The overall objective of this nationwide, prospective, observational study conducted within the National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Research Program was to assess trajectories in specific cognitive domains in patients with breast cancer (stage I-IIIC) receiving chemotherapy, from pre- (A1) to postchemotherapy (A2) and from prechemotherapy to 6 months postchemotherapy (A3); controls were assessed at the same time-equivalent points. The primary aim assessed visual memory using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Delayed Match to Sample test by longitudinal mixed models including A1, A2, and A3 and adjusting for age, education, race, cognitive reserve score, and baseline anxiety and depressive symptoms. We also assessed trajectories of CRCI in other aspects of memory as well as in attention and executive function with computerized, paper-based, and telephone-based cognitive tests. Results In total, 580 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 53.4 years) and 363 controls (mean age, 52.6 years) were assessed. On the Delayed Match to Sample test, the longitudinal mixed model results revealed a significant group-by-time effect ( P < .005); patients declined over time from prechemotherapy (A1) to 6 months postchemotherapy (A3; P = .005), but controls did not change ( P = .426). The group difference between patients and controls was also significant, revealing declines in patients but not controls ( P = .017). Several other models of computerized, standard, and telephone tests indicated significantly worse performance by patients compared with controls from pre- to postchemotherapy and from prechemotherapy to 6 months postchemotherapy. Conclusion This nationwide study showed CRCI in patients with breast cancer affects multiple cognitive domains for at least 6 months postchemotherapy.

Purpose: Clinical trials of venetoclax reported negligible rates of clinical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) when using an extended dose escalation schedule. We aimed to understand TLS prophylaxis, rates of select adverse events (AE), and impact of dosing modifications in routine clinical practice.Experimental Design: This retrospective cohort study included 297 CLL venetoclax-treated patients outside of clinical trials in academic and community centers. Demographics, baseline disease characteristics, venetoclax dosing, TLS risk and prophylaxis, and AEs were collected.Results: The group was 69% male, 96% had relapsed/ refractory CLL, 45% had deletion chromosome 17p, 84% had unmutated IGHV, 80% received venetoclax monotherapy, and median age was 67. TLS risk was categorized as low (40%), intermediate (32%), or high (28%), and 62% had imaging prior to venetoclax initiation. Clinical TLS occurred in 2.7% of patients and laboratory TLS occurred in 5.7%. Pre-venetoclax TLS risk group and creatinine clearance independently predict TLS development in multivariable analysis. Grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (39.6%), thrombocytopenia (29.2%), infection (25%), neutropenic fever (7.9%), and diarrhea (6.9%). Twenty-two patients (7.4%) discontinued venetoclax due to an AE. Progression-free survival was similar regardless of number of dose interruptions, length of dose interruption, and stable venetoclax dose.Conclusions: These data provide insights into current use of venetoclax in clinical practice, including TLS rates observed in clinical practice. We identified opportunities for improved adherence to TLS risk stratification and prophylaxis, which may improve safety.

Author affiliations and support information (if applicable) appear at the end of this article.

Background We aimed to characterize premature aging as an accumulation of deficits in survivors of pediatric cancer compared to community controls and examine associations with host/treatment factors, neurocognition, and mortality. Methods Pediatric cancer survivors (N = 4,000, median age 28.6 [IQR 23-35], 20 [15-27] years post-diagnosis) and community controls (N = 638, median age 32 [25-40]) completed clinical assessments, questionnaires, and were followed for mortality through April 30th, 2020 (mean [SD] follow-up 7.0 [3.4] years). A deficit accumulation index (DAI) score was calculated from 44 aging-related items including: self-reported daily function, psychosocial symptoms, and health conditions. Items were weighted from 0 (absent) to 1 (present/most severe), summed and divided by the total yielding a ratio (higher=more deficits). Scores &lt;0.20 are robust and 0.06 is a clinically meaningful difference. Linear regression compared the DAI in survivors and controls with an age*survivor/control interaction. Logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazards estimated the risk of neurocognitive impairment and death. Models were minimally adjusted for age, sex, and race andethnicity. Results The adjusted mean DAI among survivors at age 30 years was 0.16 corresponding to age 63 in controls (33 years premature aging; β = 0.07 95%CI 0.06-0.08; p&lt;.001). Cranial/abdominal radiation, alkylators, platinum, and neurosurgery were associated with worse DAI (p’s≤.001). Higher scores were associated with increased risk of neurocognitive impairment in all domains (p’s&lt;.001) and increased risk of death (DAI 0.20-0.35 HR = 2.80, 95%CI 1.97-3.98; DAI ≥0.35 HR = 5.08, 95%CI 3.52-7.34). Conclusion  Pediatric cancer survivors experience significant premature aging. The DAI may be used to identify survivors at greatest risk of poor health outcomes.

No abstract

Objective This study used childhood cancer survivors as a novel model to study whether children who experience central nervous system (CNS) injury are at higher risk for neurocognitive impairment associated with subsequent late onset chronic health conditions (CHCs). Methods Adult survivors of childhood cancer (n = 2,859, ≥10 years from diagnosis, ≥18 years old) completed a comprehensive neurocognitive battery and clinical examination. Neurocognitive impairment was defined as age‐adjusted z score < 10th percentile. Participants impaired on ≥3 tests had global impairment. CHCs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.3 (grade 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe/disabling; 4, life‐threatening) and were combined into a severity/burden score by frequency and grade (none/low, medium, high, and very high). A total of 1,598 survivors received CNS‐directed therapy including cranial radiation, intrathecal methotrexate, or neurosurgery. Logistic regression estimated the odds of neurocognitive impairment associated with severity/burden score and grade 2 to 4 conditions, stratified by CNS treatment. Results CNS‐treated survivors performed worse than non–CNS‐treated survivors on all neurocognitive tests and were more likely to have global neurocognitive impairment (46.9% vs 35.3%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for demographic and treatment factors, there was a dose–response association between severity/burden score and global neurocognitive impairment, but only among CNS‐treated survivors (high odds ratio [OR] = 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.42–3.53; very high OR = 4.07, 95% CI = 2.30–7.17). Cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions were associated with processing speed, executive function, and memory impairments in CNS‐treated but not non–CNS‐treated survivors who were impacted by neurologic conditions. Interpretation Reduced cognitive/brain reserve associated with CNS‐directed therapy during childhood may make survivors vulnerable to adverse cognitive effects of cardiopulmonary conditions during adulthood. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:534–545

Background: As oral targeted agents, such as ibrutinib, become more widely used understanding the impact of suboptimal dosing on overall and progression-free survival outside of clinical trials is imperative. Methods: Data on ibrutinib discontinuation, dose reductions and treatment interruptions were collected on 170 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL n=115, 64%) patients treated with ibrutinib at a single institution. Ibrutinib dose adherence was calculated as the proportion of days in which ibrutinib was administered out of the total number of days ibrutinib was prescribed in the first 8 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare conditional survival outcomes beyond 8 weeks in patients ≥80% dose adherence and patients <80% dose adherence. Results: Median overall survival among those that discontinued for progression was poor (n=51, 1.7 months, 95%CI 0.3–3.7). Lower dose adherence (<80%) was associated with significantly worse progression-free (p=0.002) and overall survival (p=0.024). However, among CLL patients, lower dose adherence was only associated with worse progression-free survival (p=0.043). Patients with early dose reductions had significant worse PFS (p=0.004) and OS (p=0.014). Patients with dose interruptions lasting > 1 week had worse PFS (p=0.047) but not OS (p=0.577). Conclusion: In this observational study, NHL and CLL patients demonstrated poor outcomes after discontinuing ibrutinib for disease progression. The inferior survival related to suboptimal dose adherence of ibrutinib was predominantly due to early dose reduction. These data confirm poor survival in CLL and lymphoma patients alike after ibrutinib discontinuation and support recommendations for full dose at treatment initiation.