IBR-DTN to Solve Communication Problem on Post-Disaster Rescue Mission

Fauzan, Muhammad Al; Purboyo, Tito Waluyo; Setianingsih, Casi

doi:10.1109/isitia.2019.8937256

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In [156], the so-called IBR-DTN architecture (i.e., an implementation of the bundle protocol RFC5050) has been shown to be effective when sending small size data such as text messages. On the other side, if the connection is lost during the transmission then the entire file would need to be sent again, which makes this architecture very inefficient for sending heavy files.…”

Section: Dtnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

Matracia

Saeed

Kishk

et al. 2022

IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of disasters has increased over the past decade where these calamities significantly affect the functionality of communication networks. In the context of 6G, airborne and spaceborne networks offer hope in disaster recovery to serve the underserved and to be resilient in calamities. Therefore, our paper reviews the state-of-the-art literature on post-disaster wireless communication networks and provides insights for the future establishment of such networks. In particular, we first give an overview of the works investigating the general procedures and strategies for facing any large-scale disaster. Then, we present technological solutions for post-disaster communications, such as the recovery of the terrestrial infrastructure, installing aerial networks, and using spaceborne networks. Afterwards, we shed light on the technological aspects of post-disaster networks, primarily the physical and networking issues. We present the literature on channel modeling, coverage and capacity, radio resource management, localization, and energy efficiency in the physical layer part, and discuss the integrated space-air-ground architectures, routing, delay-tolerant/software-defined networks, and edge computing in the networking layer part. This paper also includes interesting simulation results which can provide practical guidelines about the deployment of ad hoc network architectures in emergency scenarios. Finally, we present several promising research directions, namely backhauling, cache-enabled and intelligent reflective surface-enabled networks, placement optimization of aerial base stations (ABSs), and the mobility-related aspects that come into play when deploying aerial networks, such as planning their trajectories and the consequent handovers (HOs).

show abstract

Section: Dtnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

Matracia

Saeed

Kishk

et al. 2022

IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interestingly, the Mininet-WiFi simulation results suggested that the proposed architecture can achieve a packet loss as low as 0.46%. In [142], instead, the so-called IBR-DTN architecture (i.e., an implementation of the bundle protocol RFC5050) has been shown to be effective when sending small size data such as text messages. On the other side, if the connection is lost during the transmission then the entire file would need to be sent again, which makes this architecture very inefficient for sending heavy files.…”

Section: Dtns and Sdnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Demand forecasting [147] IBR-DTN [142] 2020 Resource allocation [148] SDN, DTN 2020 Message delivery rate, packet loss [12] was tested via simulations, showing its effectiveness in reducing redundant transmissions and improving the message delivery ratio.…”

Section: Dtn 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

Matracia¹,

Saeed²,

Kishk³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of disasters has increased over the past decade where these calamities significantly affect the functionality of communication networks. In the context of 6G, airborne and spaceborne networks offer hope in disaster recovery to serve the underserved and to be resilient in calamities. Therefore, this paper surveys the state-of-the-art literature on post-disaster wireless communication networks and provides insights for the future establishment of such networks. In particular, we first give an overview of the works investigating the general procedures and strategies for counteracting any large-scale disasters. Then, we present the possible technological solutions for post-disaster communications, such as the recovery of the terrestrial infrastructure, installing aerial networks, and using spaceborne networks.Afterward, we shed light on the technological aspects of post-disaster networks, primarily the physical and networking issues. We present the literature on channel modeling, coverage and capacity, radio resource management, localization, and energy efficiency in the physical layer and discuss the integrated space-air-ground architectures, routing, delay-tolerant/software-defined networks, and edge computing in the networking layer. This paper also presents interesting simulation results which can provide practical guidelines about the deployment of ad hoc network architectures in emergency scenarios. Finally, we present several promising research directions, namely backhauling, placement optimization of aerial base stations, and the mobility-related aspects that come into play when deploying aerial networks, such as planning their trajectories and the consequent handovers.Maurilio Matracia and Mohamed-Slim Alouini are with the Computer, Electrical, and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering

show abstract

“…Forming the store-andforward network. Bundle Protocol has several implementations for various platforms available, research as [5][6] [7] have shown that the free software IBR-DTN [8] is an efficient implementation of the Bundle Protocol for embedded systems. In IBR-DTN, the exchange of information by the nodes occurs using the Wi-Fi module of the devices capable of receiving its installation.…”

Section: Used Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delay/Disruption Tolerant Mesh Network Using LibreMesh and IBR-DTN

Tavares¹,

Neto²,

Müller³

et al. 2020

Anais De XXXVIII Simpósio Brasileiro De Telecomunicações E Processamento De Sinais

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) allows communication between wireless devices with the aid of multihop wireless mesh routers, while they are within range of the radios, under penalty of data loss. But, long distances, delays, disruptions or disconnections between nodes are a challenge to Wireless Mesh Network. The DTN (Delay / Disruption Tolerant Networking) technology allows the transfer of continuous and quality data in a network, this technology has a data delivery guaranteed by its Store-and-Forward mechanism. This article presents a low-cost and easy implementation of a Delay/Disruption Tolerant Wireless Mesh Network, through WMN associate with DTN. For the easy and low-cost implementation, we use the tools LibreMesh and IBR-DTN, because they are free and have low complexity. The validation of the implementation was through an analysis of Packet Loss and Round Trip Time (RTT) between the Mesh Network with and without the DTN association.

show abstract

IBR-DTN to Solve Communication Problem on Post-Disaster Rescue Mission

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

Delay/Disruption Tolerant Mesh Network Using LibreMesh and IBR-DTN

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About