2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iatrogenic inferior oblique palsy: intentional disinsertion during transcaruncular approach to orbital fracture repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Another case of IO disinsertion during transcaruncular approach for orbital fracture repair lead to an IO palsy which required surgical correction of the persistent hypotropia and incyclotropia. 14 However, other reports of intentional IO disinsertion followed by muscle reposition within the orbit showed no lasting postoperative motility deficits or diplopia. 1,15 The IO is often regarded as a forgiving muscle and may be less likely to elicit diplopia when injured, compared with other EOMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…13 Another case of IO disinsertion during transcaruncular approach for orbital fracture repair lead to an IO palsy which required surgical correction of the persistent hypotropia and incyclotropia. 14 However, other reports of intentional IO disinsertion followed by muscle reposition within the orbit showed no lasting postoperative motility deficits or diplopia. 1,15 The IO is often regarded as a forgiving muscle and may be less likely to elicit diplopia when injured, compared with other EOMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Seventeen and 23 patients had right and left orbital wall fractures, respectively. The mean follow-up visit was 9 ± 3.47 months (range, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Patients showed enophthalmos of -1.46 ± 0.25 (range, -5 to 3) mm compared with the normal side.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that IOM manipulation during the cutting and reattaching procedure in group 2 may cause muscle paresis and inflammation and induce initial limitation of eye movement. 15 To summarize these results about IOM underaction, diplopia, and EOM limitation, both surgical skills were equally remarkable and showed similar postoperative sequelae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Adhesion of extraocular muscles, particularly to porous implants, can be equally problematic at times, 196,197 as can iatrogenic disinsertion of the inferior oblique at its origin, which may be required to place an implant along the nasal wall of the orbit. 198…”
Section: P366mentioning
confidence: 99%