2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2017.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IARPA Janus Benchmark-B Face Dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
239
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
239
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we describe the training dataset, validation set, and implementation details. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed AFRN on the LFW [11], YTF [37], IJB-A [17] and IJB-B [36] datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we describe the training dataset, validation set, and implementation details. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed AFRN on the LFW [11], YTF [37], IJB-A [17] and IJB-B [36] datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• We show that the proposed AFRN improves effectively the accuracy of both face verification and face identification. • To investigate the effectiveness of the AFRN, we present extensive experiments on the public available datasets such as LFW [11], YTF [37], Cross-Age LFW (CALFW), Cross-Pose LFW (CPLFW), Celebrities in Frontal-Profile in the Wild (CFP) [30], AgeDB [23], IARPA Janus Benchmark-A (IJB-A) [17], IARPA Janus Benchmark-B (IJB-B) [36], and IARPA Janus Benchmark-C (IJB-C) [22]. ded features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has tough variability with face imagery presenting a wide range of poses, harsh illuminations, occlusions, aging and other challenging conditions. For all these reasons, the series IJB-{A,B,C} [12,26,21] quickly became the de facto standard for face recognition in the wild.…”
Section: Ijbc-irdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probes have one-to-many faces. Following template conventions of other many-to-many face evaluations, facial images for unique subjects are separated by identity, with a gallery containing variable number of relatives, each with a variable number of faces [32]. Teams were allowed to submit up to six final submissions, with each submissions being a ranked-list of all subjects in the gallery.…”
Section: Fmsmentioning
confidence: 99%