“I Will. Protect this House:” Under Armour, Corporate Nationalism and Post-9/11 Cultural Politics

Abstract

This article explores the construction of U.S. nationalism through the branding strategies of Under Armour, a sportswear company which has achieved prominence in the U.S. marketplace and has a growing international profile. By examining their organizational synergies with the NFL, Zephyr technology, and the Wounded Warrior Project, and through a critical reading of the militaristic, philanthropic, nationalistic and masculine dimensions of their Freedom initiative, I illustrate how Under Armour has strategically sought to appeal to the heightened nationalistic tendencies of the post-9/11 United States. A central contention throughout the paper is that Under Armour’s brand development techniques, as mobilized predominantly through their website, offer important theoretical and empirical insights regarding the production, circulation, performance, and embodiment of post-9/11 cultural politics.

United We Stand, Divided We Kneel: Examining Perceptions of the NFL Anthem Protest on Organizational Reputation

“…This study, at least in the case of the NFL, shows that sport does have an influence on political attitudes (Wheaton, 2015). Considering that sport organizations overall are having to increasingly develop their crisis response strategies (Weedon, 2012), examining the landscape of nationalism and patriotism on an international level is key to responding to possible future crises.…”

Retheorizing the Cultural Politics of Sport After a Decade of Activism, Populism, and Polarization

“…Eventually topics ranging from neoliberalism (Hartmann, 2016;Newman & Giardina, 2011) to ability/disability (Howe, 2008) also came to the fore. In the wake of the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the 2000s witnessed a plethora of work on the role of sport in reproducing and legitimating national unity and the established political order (Silk, 2013;Weedon, 2012), especially in the domains of patriotism and nationalism (Kusz, 2007;Newman, 2007;Silk & Falcous, 2005), patriarchy and hyper-masculinity (Leonard, 2012), and militarism (Fischer, 2014;Kusz, 2017;Schimmel, 2017). With its focus on political functions and symbolic implications, such work is crucial to making the case for the independent, irreducible social force of sport in society to scholars and critics who are skeptical of, or dismissive about, it.…”

Analysis of the Coverage of Paratriathlon and Paratriathletes in Canadian Newspapers

“…Conroy made the case that the Paralympics is only allowing people with certain impairments to compete [ 64 ]. Weedon covering the aspect of nationalism and sport gave voice to the paratriathlete Stockwell stating “Stockwell reflected on her successes as a swimmer in the 2008 Beijing Paralympics and world champion paratriathlete in the context of her life-long patriotism” [ 66 ].…”