Abstract:Background: On account of their racial/ethnic minority status, class, and gender, African-American women of low socioeconomic status are among the least privileged, underserved, and most marginalized groups in the United States. Generally, African Americans continue to experience poorer health outcomes, in which disparities have been attributed to socioeconomic inequities and structural racism. This objective of this study was to explore the lived experiences of low-income African-American women in interacting… Show more
“…The type of communication patients receive during clinical encounters is associated with their overall health care experience. Studies have observed lower quality communication during health care visits among racial and ethnic minority patients than among white patients [34][35][36] and alarming racial biases in assessing and treating pain. 37 A growing body of literature [38][39][40][41][42][43] posits that addressing this issue is all the more important during the perinatal period, therefore, improving patient-provider relationships by way of tackling perceived discrimination and problematic communication encounters is a needed strategy to reduce racial disparities in maternity care and birth outcomes.…”
Background:
Preterm birth (PTB) is a pressing maternal and child health issue with long-standing racial inequities in outcomes and care provision. 17-Alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHPC) has been one of few clinical interventions for recurrent PTB prevention. Little is known about the factors influencing successful administration and receipt of 17OHPC among mothers in the Medicaid program.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted individual semistructured interviews with 17OHPC-eligible pregnant women and obstetric providers from two academic medical centers in Philadelphia, PA. Patient participants were publicly insured, eligible for 17OHPC treatment, and purposively sampled as either (1) actively receiving treatment or (2) declining/discontinuing treatment. Providers had experience providing care to Medicaid-enrolled patients. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed to identify themes related to treatment acceptability, access, and adherence.
Results:
Of the 17 patient participants, the mean age was 30 years. Ten providers (MDs, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses) were also interviewed. Factors facilitating 17OHPC uptake and adherence among patients included severity of prior PTB, provider counseling, and coordination among the clinic, pharmacy, and insurance. Pain was cited as the most significant barrier to 17OHPC for patients, while providers perceived social adversity and beliefs about patients' commitment to treatment to be primary patient barriers. For providers, clinical experience and practice guidelines contributed to their use of 17OHPC. Administrative complexity and coordination of services were the primary provider barrier to 17OHPC administration.
Conclusions:
Patient–provider communication is a primary driver of 17OHPC acceptability and adherence. Comprehensive patient-centered consultation may improve uptake of clinical therapies among pregnant women at high risk for PTB.
“…The type of communication patients receive during clinical encounters is associated with their overall health care experience. Studies have observed lower quality communication during health care visits among racial and ethnic minority patients than among white patients [34][35][36] and alarming racial biases in assessing and treating pain. 37 A growing body of literature [38][39][40][41][42][43] posits that addressing this issue is all the more important during the perinatal period, therefore, improving patient-provider relationships by way of tackling perceived discrimination and problematic communication encounters is a needed strategy to reduce racial disparities in maternity care and birth outcomes.…”
Background:
Preterm birth (PTB) is a pressing maternal and child health issue with long-standing racial inequities in outcomes and care provision. 17-Alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHPC) has been one of few clinical interventions for recurrent PTB prevention. Little is known about the factors influencing successful administration and receipt of 17OHPC among mothers in the Medicaid program.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted individual semistructured interviews with 17OHPC-eligible pregnant women and obstetric providers from two academic medical centers in Philadelphia, PA. Patient participants were publicly insured, eligible for 17OHPC treatment, and purposively sampled as either (1) actively receiving treatment or (2) declining/discontinuing treatment. Providers had experience providing care to Medicaid-enrolled patients. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed to identify themes related to treatment acceptability, access, and adherence.
Results:
Of the 17 patient participants, the mean age was 30 years. Ten providers (MDs, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses) were also interviewed. Factors facilitating 17OHPC uptake and adherence among patients included severity of prior PTB, provider counseling, and coordination among the clinic, pharmacy, and insurance. Pain was cited as the most significant barrier to 17OHPC for patients, while providers perceived social adversity and beliefs about patients' commitment to treatment to be primary patient barriers. For providers, clinical experience and practice guidelines contributed to their use of 17OHPC. Administrative complexity and coordination of services were the primary provider barrier to 17OHPC administration.
Conclusions:
Patient–provider communication is a primary driver of 17OHPC acceptability and adherence. Comprehensive patient-centered consultation may improve uptake of clinical therapies among pregnant women at high risk for PTB.
“…19 In addition, low-income, individuals have repeatedly recounted experiences of discrimination based on socioeconomic and racial status during interactions with healthcare providers. 20 These experiences may result in avoidance of healthcare settings and paradoxically increase ED utilisation or avoidable hospitalisations due to inadequate management of chronic illnesses. 21 Persistent health inequities among Medicaid-insured individuals demand focused innovations that are centred in equity principles and bridge coordination and continuity between acute and community health providers.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of marginalising conditions is heightened during the period of transition from hospital to home when individuals are required to obtain medications or durable medical equipment, schedule and access follow-up appointments and understand and execute treatment orders all while coping with competing economic needs 19. In addition, low-income, individuals have repeatedly recounted experiences of discrimination based on socioeconomic and racial status during interactions with healthcare providers 20. These experiences may result in avoidance of healthcare settings and paradoxically increase ED utilisation or avoidable hospitalisations due to inadequate management of chronic illnesses 21…”
BackgroundChronically ill adults insured by Medicaid experience health inequities following hospitalisation.Local problemPostacute outcomes, including rates of 30-day readmissions and postacute emergency department (ED), were higher among Medicaid-insured individuals compared with commercially insured individuals and social needs were inconsistently addressed.MethodsAn interdisciplinary team introduced a clinical pathway called ‘THRIVE’ to provide postacute wrap-around services for individuals insured by Medicaid.InterventionEnrolment into the THRIVE clinical pathway occurred during hospitalisation and multidisciplinary services were deployed into homes within 48 hours of discharge to address clinical and social needs.ResultsCompared with those not enrolled in THRIVE (n=437), individuals who participated in the THRIVE clinical pathway (n=42) experienced fewer readmissions (14.3% vs 28.4%) and ED visits (14.3% vs 28.8 %).ConclusionTHRIVE is a promising clinical pathway that increases access to ambulatory care after discharge and may reduce readmissions and ED visits.
“…Esto se evidencia en los hallazgos de este estudio, que pese a tener un tamaño de efecto pequeño pero significativo, indica que la PS podría asociarse con obesidad abdominal mediante una secuencia de relaciones que considera variables tales como la discriminación percibida, afectividad negativa y calidad de la dieta. Este resultado es consistente con estudios previos que advierten que personas con menor PS están mayormente expuestas a experiencias de discriminación (Okoro et al, 2020), las cuales generan mayores niveles de estrés (Urzúa et al, 2021) y síntomas depresivos (Qin et al, 2020), lo que a su vez, genera mayor consumo de comida chatarra (Agurs-Collins & Fuemmeler, 2011), influyendo finalmente en el aumento del perímetro de cintura (Mozaffarian, 2016). Pese a lo anterior, es importante considerar que este hallazgo no es conclusivo y debe ser investigado en otros estudios.…”
Introducción: la obesidad es un problema de salud mundial que ha sido vinculada con la posición social de las personas. Si bien la evidencia que relaciona estas variables es clara, se ha puesto menos atención a los mecanismos por medio de los cuales estas variables pueden asociarse. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si la posición social se relacionaba directamente con obesidad abdominal e indirectamente vía percepción de discriminación, afectividad negativa y calidad de la dieta, y el rol moderador del apoyo social. Método: 420 funcionarios de una universidad chilena. Se midió el perímetro de cintura como proxy de obesidad,se utilizaron instrumentos de autorreporte para variables psicológicas y conductuales. Resultados: análisis de ecuaciones estructurales revelaron que la posición social no se asoció directamente con obesidad abdominal, pero sí a través de una secuencia de mediación que incluyó la percepción de discriminación, afectividad negativa y calidad de la dieta. El apoyo social no moderó estas relaciones. Conclusión: se identifican mecanismos que median el nexo entre posición social y obesidad abdominal. Se destaca la relevancia de considerar variables psicológicas y conductuales subyacentes en esta relación.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.