2019
DOI: 10.24252/eternal.v51.2019.a13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“I Use Multiple-Choice Question in Most Assessment I Prepared”: Efl Teachers’ Voice on Summative Assessment

Abstract: The study aimed at investigating Senior High School English teachers' views on the drawbacks and the strengths of the employement of Multicple Choice Question as a summative assessment. Rooting within qualitative research paradigm, the current study employed descriptive qualitative design. The data were collected through in-depth interview with three experienced EFL teachers of a prominent state senior high school in Banjar, West Java. The results of the interview indicated that there are three strengths in us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, the researcher selected the questions bank from the three basic aircraft components; cockpit, body, and tail. Then, close-ended questions as a summative evaluation in the form of multiple choice and matching were selected due to the rapid and easy scoring (Rachmat & Arfiandhani, 2019;Sabila et al, 2020).…”
Section: Figure 1 Experimental Research Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the researcher selected the questions bank from the three basic aircraft components; cockpit, body, and tail. Then, close-ended questions as a summative evaluation in the form of multiple choice and matching were selected due to the rapid and easy scoring (Rachmat & Arfiandhani, 2019;Sabila et al, 2020).…”
Section: Figure 1 Experimental Research Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used to evaluate or summarize a student's learning and is often administered at the end of a course or unit of teaching. Additionally, it results in rapid and easy scoring, facilitates the evaluation of diverse language abilities, and encourages students to respond thoughtfully to the question (Rachmat & Arfiandhani, 2019;Sabila et al, 2020).…”
Section: Evaluating the Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%