2001
DOI: 10.1071/as01027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UBV Photometry of the Massive Eclipsing Binary TT Aur

Abstract: UBV observations of the massive binary system TT Aur were carried out mainly at theTurkish National Observatory (TUG). These observations, together with IUE spectra and times of eclipse minima collected from the literature, were used to study the system parameters.Simultaneous solution of the light curves by the Wilson-Devinney code allows a semi-detached configuration with a slightly larger Roche-lobe filling secondary. This picture is supported by other evidence. The shoulders of the primary minimum suggest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7, the zero‐age main‐sequence (ZAMS) and terminal‐age main‐sequence (TAMS) of Girardi et al (2000) are plotted. A literature search reveals that the OB‐type binaries such as TT Aur (Özdemir et al 2001), SX Aur (Chambliss & Leung 1979), XZ Cep, V448 Cyg (Harries, Hilditch & Hill 1997), U Her (Hilditch 1984), VY Lac (Semeniuk & Kaluzny 1984), β Lyr (Harmanec 1990), DM Per (Hilditch, Hill & Khalesseh 1992), IZ Per (Srivastava & Padalia 1970), V356 Sgr, Z Vul (Hilditch & Bell 1987), V Pup (Andersen et al 1983), μ 1 Sco (Schneider, Darland & Leung 1979), V337 Aql (Giuricin & Mardirossian 1981), IU Aur (Giuricin et al 1979) and LY Aur (Cester et al 1978) are all similar to V716 Cen. All of these systems are semidetached and mass transfer occurs from the less massive, Roche lobe filling secondary component to the more massive primary in core hydrogen‐burning phase, namely Case A (Paczyński 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, the zero‐age main‐sequence (ZAMS) and terminal‐age main‐sequence (TAMS) of Girardi et al (2000) are plotted. A literature search reveals that the OB‐type binaries such as TT Aur (Özdemir et al 2001), SX Aur (Chambliss & Leung 1979), XZ Cep, V448 Cyg (Harries, Hilditch & Hill 1997), U Her (Hilditch 1984), VY Lac (Semeniuk & Kaluzny 1984), β Lyr (Harmanec 1990), DM Per (Hilditch, Hill & Khalesseh 1992), IZ Per (Srivastava & Padalia 1970), V356 Sgr, Z Vul (Hilditch & Bell 1987), V Pup (Andersen et al 1983), μ 1 Sco (Schneider, Darland & Leung 1979), V337 Aql (Giuricin & Mardirossian 1981), IU Aur (Giuricin et al 1979) and LY Aur (Cester et al 1978) are all similar to V716 Cen. All of these systems are semidetached and mass transfer occurs from the less massive, Roche lobe filling secondary component to the more massive primary in core hydrogen‐burning phase, namely Case A (Paczyński 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. Özdemir et al 2001). For δ Lib, we can examine residuals from the main parabolic trend for further effects in view of the possible additional components in the system (Worek 1998; Lazaro, Arevalo & Claret 2002; Budding et al 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… References: (1) Liao & Qian (2009a); (2) Mayer (1987); (3) Kreiner et al (2001); (4) Linnell, Peters & Polidan (1988); (5) Özdemir et al (2001); (6) Kallrath & Strassmeier (2000); (7) Qian, Zhu & Boonruksar (2006a); (8) Özdemir et al (2003); (9) Drechsel, Lorenz & Mayer (1989); (10) Vivekananda Rao, Sarma & Abhyankar (1999); (11) Todorova (1993); (12) Hill et al (1994); (13) Vitrichenko, Nadyozhin & Razinkova (2007); (14) Liao & Qian (2009b); (15) Rucinski et al (1992); (16) Qian, Liu & Kreiner (2006b); (17) Zhu et al (2009); (18) Milano et al (1988); (19) Lipari & Sistero (1985); (20) Kim, Nha & Kreiner (2005); (21) Borkovits & Hegedüs (1996); (22) Demircan et al (1997); (23) Pribulla et al (2009); (24) Giuricin, Mardirossian & Mezzetti (1982); (25) Zabihinpoor, Dariush & Riazi (1982); (26) Al‐Naimiy et al (1985); (27) Qian et al (2007b); (28) Rauw, Vreux & Bohannan (1999); (29) Ibanoǧlu et al (2001); (30) Çakirli et al (2003); (31) Zasche (2005); (32) Linnell, Hubeny & Harmanec (1998); (33) Qian et al (2008b); (34) Stickland et al (1998); (35) Malasan, Yamasaki & Kitamura (1989); (36) Banks, Sullivan & Budding (1990); (37) Johansen, Helt & Clausen (1997); (38) Russo & Sollazzo (1981); (39) Zhu, Qian & Yang (2008); (40) Zhu & Qian (2006); (41) Zhu, Qian & Xiang (2004). …”
Section: The Most Plausible Explanation Of the Cyclic Period Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%