New Advances in Transcendence Theory 1988
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511897184.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S-unit equations and their applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the theory and applications of such and related equations we refer to [3,4,5,6,7,8], and the references therein. Recently, Hajdu [9], and Jarden and Narkiewicz [10], independently, have investigated arithmetic progressions in the linear combinations of elements from such groups Γ.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the theory and applications of such and related equations we refer to [3,4,5,6,7,8], and the references therein. Recently, Hajdu [9], and Jarden and Narkiewicz [10], independently, have investigated arithmetic progressions in the linear combinations of elements from such groups Γ.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Finally, we are left with the case where there is no β s of the form u + α with α satisfying (15). In this case a simple calculation shows that if g s (x) | H 1 (x) − u 0 then there is no linear polynomial dividing H 1 (x) + u 0 .…”
Section: ) Is Reducible If and Only If Either F(x) Is Equivalent To Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case a simple calculation shows that if g s (x) | H 1 (x) − u 0 then there is no linear polynomial dividing H 1 (x) + u 0 . Let now g r (x) | H 1 (x) + u 0 for some r = s. We recall the well-known fact (which can also be readily checked) that if 2 has a divisor different from ±1, ±2 in the ring of integers of an imaginary quadratic number field K then we have K = Q(α) with α satisfying (15). Hence a simple calculation yields that now g r (β s ) ∈ {−2, −1, 1, 2} must be valid.…”
Section: ) Is Reducible If and Only If Either F(x) Is Equivalent To Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (14) can always be reduced to a unit equation in two variables over K (see [7]). In our case, since we deal with relative conjugates over M , the factor corresponding to µ cancels, and the units in this unit equation have 4 factors with unknown exponents.…”
Section: Fundamental Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%