2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-010-0241-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreducibility criteria of Schur-type and Pólya-type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above norm inequalities were applied in Győry and Lovász [7], Győry [11], and Aubry and Poulakis [1] to diophantine equations, and in Győry [8], [9], [10], [12], [13], Schinzel [24], and Győry, Hajdu and Tijdeman [14] to irreducible polynomials.…”
Section: Norm Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above norm inequalities were applied in Győry and Lovász [7], Győry [11], and Aubry and Poulakis [1] to diophantine equations, and in Győry [8], [9], [10], [12], [13], Schinzel [24], and Győry, Hajdu and Tijdeman [14] to irreducible polynomials.…”
Section: Norm Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We repeat this procedure for i Im α and Re α as well. If there exists a ϕ j such that (Re α)ϕ j = Re α and (i Im α)ϕ j = i Im α, then it follows from (12), (13) and (14) that It remains the case when, for each j, (Re α)ϕ j = Re α or (i Im α)ϕ j = i Im α. But the number of Q-isomorphisms which leave Re α resp.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first criterion of this kind was suggested by Schur [21], who raised the question of the irreducibility of the polynomials of the form (X − a 1 ) · · · (X − a n ) ± 1. For a unifying approach of the irreducibility criteria for polynomials of this type, we refer the interested reader to [10], [11] and [12]. …”
Section: Then F (X Y ) Is Irreducible Over K(x) the Same Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the years, arithmetic properties of the function F P (n) attracted considerable attention of several authors. Perhaps the first occurrence of this object in the literature dates back to Chebyshev, who considered the case P 0 (n) = n 2 + 1 and showed that the largest prime factor of F P 0 (n) is ≫ n. See also [12], [13], [15] for refinements of the latter result. Another direction in this investigation stems from equations of the form F P (n) = m k (1) where m, n ∈ N, k ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%