Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2076354.2076390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Point it, split it, peel it, view it"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good examples of this approach are Jorda et al's [40] prototype for live music performance as well as Al-Megren and Ruddle's [1] setup for abstract data analysis. An example of such a combination for spatial 3D visualization is Sultanum et al's [69] table-based system for exploring geologic reservoir data. They use tangible props for detailed data read-out and parameterizing a focus+context view, while tactile input is used for regular data navigation as well as for dedicated exploration techniques such as dataset splitting and layer peeling.…”
Section: Combinations Of Tactile and Tangible Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Good examples of this approach are Jorda et al's [40] prototype for live music performance as well as Al-Megren and Ruddle's [1] setup for abstract data analysis. An example of such a combination for spatial 3D visualization is Sultanum et al's [69] table-based system for exploring geologic reservoir data. They use tangible props for detailed data read-out and parameterizing a focus+context view, while tactile input is used for regular data navigation as well as for dedicated exploration techniques such as dataset splitting and layer peeling.…”
Section: Combinations Of Tactile and Tangible Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were interested in their general opinion about such a hybrid interaction style, their understanding of the mappings, the way they transition between different modalities, how well the chosen mappings support their data exploration goals, and how they made use of those interaction capabilities in practice. We used an observational strategy like several visualization researchers before us (e. g., [19,44,48,49,69]). We specifically decided against a classical usability study for several reasons.…”
Section: Observational Study With Expert Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the domain-specific setups and also the data-driven approaches pay attention to the ability to combine different interaction techniques in such a way that they can be employed in the same interaction space, an aspect that is also essential in our approach. Mode switching is often enabled using postures, while Sultanum et al [SSSS11] also use tangibles and Lundström et al [LRF * 11] virtual objects for the same purpose. Some techniques essential in visualizationbeyond our 'normal' navigation and zooming [YSI * 10]have been studied before.…”
Section: Direct-touch Interaction In Scientific Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some techniques essential in visualizationbeyond our 'normal' navigation and zooming [YSI * 10]have been studied before. For example, cutting [SSSS11] and cutting planes [CML * 11], probing [SSSS11], particle placement [BW11], and combinations of 2D and 3D interaction [CML * 11] have previously been discussed individually. Our application domain of fluid mechanics, however, like many other visualization fields requires all of these and other techniques to be accessible, while some (e. g., cutting planes) also need to be controllable with more DOF.…”
Section: Direct-touch Interaction In Scientific Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%