2004
DOI: 10.1086/424529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PlasmodiumDNA Contamination between Blood Smears during Giemsa Staining and Microscopic Examination

Abstract: Giemsa-stained blood smears are mainly used for microscopic examination to diagnose malaria. However, they may also be subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm diagnosis or for retrospective studies requiring the analysis of old smears. We investigated the possibility of DNA contamination occurring during automated Giemsa staining or due to the failure to clean the oil-immersion objective during microscopic examination. We tested blood smears from uninfected, Plasmodium vivax-infected, and P. fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though it is likely that the infections detected only by the assay were, in fact, "submicroscopic", they may also be the result of poorly-sensitive microscopy. Moreover, microscopy can be an imperfect reference standard used for malaria diagnosis, and this study did not have microscopy quality control [29,30]. Additionally, the pfldh PCR assay, though simple and easy to perform, detects only P. falciparum infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though it is likely that the infections detected only by the assay were, in fact, "submicroscopic", they may also be the result of poorly-sensitive microscopy. Moreover, microscopy can be an imperfect reference standard used for malaria diagnosis, and this study did not have microscopy quality control [29,30]. Additionally, the pfldh PCR assay, though simple and easy to perform, detects only P. falciparum infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods were tried (20 smears per method) to remove the blood from the slides for DNA extraction: use of a scalpel (Aubouy & Carme, 2004) or slide scraper (Sykes et al, 2008), as previously described, and use of a sterile swab moistened in PBS firmly rubbed over the entirety of the slide. Use of the scalpel or slide scraper made it difficult to remove all of the blood from the slide and concern regarding laboratory contamination arose due to blood smear material becoming airborne during removal, so an optimized method using a swab moistened in PBS was used for further studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, microscopic diagnosis using staining techniques, for instance Gram staining or Giemsa staining to search for bacteria or parasites, respectively, does not usually allow the long-term conservation of samples. 9,10 Moreover, while genomic DNA has been recovered efficiently from untreated glass slides, 11 recycling such glass slides for the DNA extraction is as toxic as some other fixatives. The combination of alcohol and acid (in particular acetic acid), denatures proteins and DNA.…”
Section: Smear Slide Systems That Have Been Used For Other Microorganmentioning
confidence: 99%