Pièces de Résistance? Core and Casual Consumers’ Valuations of Aesthetically Incongruent Artworks

Abstract

Research in consumer psychology suggests that there is limited room for acclaimed producers or brands to experiment with the aesthetic appearance and design of their products. This premise is rooted in consumers’ preference for aesthetic congruity and the cognitive difficulty associated with evaluating incongruent offerings. Yet examples of successful artists whose work clearly defies the imperative of congruity do exist. Although these artists are the exception rather than the rule, their success suggests that under certain conditions the audience may tolerate incongruity. The effects of the type of audience and the status of the artist on consumer valuations of aesthetically congruent and incongruent artworks were analyzed in a large within‐subjects experiment. The results show that congruity weighs more heavily for core consumers than for casual consumers, regardless of the status of the artist. Mediation analyses reveal that dislike (affective factor) and difficulty of evaluation (cognitive factor) fully explain the negative effects of incongruity on consumer judgments of aesthetic value, monetary value, and creativity. The positive effects of status are only partially mediated by liking and ease of evaluation. The article concludes with the implications of these findings for psychology and marketing, and specifically for “marketing the arts”.

Style Typologies and Competitive Advantage

“…Since the identification of the intrinsic qualities of products and producers in the creative industries is complicated by widespread uncertainty on both the demand and supply sides (Caves, 2000;Hirsch, 1972), the combinatorial and aesthetic nature of style can firmly guide people's understanding and evaluation. Althuizen and Sgourev (2014) are clear on this point. Creative industries are contexts "where innovation and the forging of a distinct style are necessary to attract attention and establish a reputation" (2014, p. 605).…”

Revisiting Berlyne's inverted U‐shape relationship between complexity and liking: The role of effort, arousal, and status in the appreciation of product design aesthetics

“…And a study by Pocheptsova et al (2010) found a positive association between increased cognitive effort (or disfluency) and perceived originality, but only for exclusive products. Status cues may interfere in evaluative processes by generating arousal or interest and/or evoking associations with producer effort or skill (Althuizen & Sgourev, 2014). For example, a Louis Vuitton bag with a simple aesthetic design may still produce sufficient arousal and evoke positive associations with the amount of effort or skill that went into its design.…”

“It’s good.” “says who?”: the mediating role of professional legitimacy on the relationship between film-extension performance and changes in directors’ human brand identity

“…This is a particularly important finding as the human brand can control his/her extension strategy. It is also important in view of existing results in the product brand literature, which conclude on the negative role played by moderate levels of incongruence when the performance is poor (Roedder John et al, 1998) or by stronger levels of incongruence for core customers (Althuizen and Sgourev, 2014) on brand identity dilution. We also build on past research stating the difficulty of convincing internal stakeholders to accept incongruent extension projects (Phillips and Zuckerman, 2001) and we conclude that once these are achieved, the social rewards generated can be higher than for congruent extension projects, at least for the expectancy dimension of congruence, i.e.…”