1954
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1954.7.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive and Active Tension-Length Diagrams of Intact Skeletal Muscle in Normal Women of Different Ages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physiological length changes in muscle in a previous study were 20% or less [42]. Researchers in other studies who have shown positive results by removing extracellular calcium or blocking stretch-activated receptors used length changes of 30% to 40% of L o [12,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological length changes in muscle in a previous study were 20% or less [42]. Researchers in other studies who have shown positive results by removing extracellular calcium or blocking stretch-activated receptors used length changes of 30% to 40% of L o [12,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prolongation of relaxation in elderly [10,11] increases tetanus fusion which in result gives a bigger muscle stiffness. As mentioned previously, MMG signals are related to muscle stiffness [14] and force fluctuation; both factors, however, change with age [7,8,18,42,43]. In addition, the effect of aging on the angle-EMG or angle-MMG relation might not be the same in the triceps brachii, biceps brachii, and brachioradialis muscles because they differ in morphology [9,31,39] and functional capabilities [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Increased collagen content and stiffness are seen in numerous musculoskeletal pathologies, including spasticity (M. Brown et al, 1999; Damiano et al, 2001; Gracies, 2005; Vaz et al, 2006), as well as typical aging (Alnaqeeb et al, 1984; Botelho et al, 1954; Larsson et al, 1979; Tomonaga, 1977). It is clear that muscle stiffness is closely related to joint constraint – increased muscle stiffness is associated with poor range of motion, while reductions in muscle stiffness may predispose to joint subluxation (Johns and Wright, 1962; Vandervoort, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%