1953
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.jgs.1953.109.01-04.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palaeoscolex piscatorum gen. et sp. nov., a worm from the Tremadocian of Shropshire

Abstract: Summary The unique preservation among fossil annelids of a worm from the Tremadocian has retained the form of the gut, the jaw apparatus and the minute detail of the surface of the skin. The new genus cannot confidently be placed in any known division of the annelids.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A worm known in detail from the British Tremadoc is Palaeoscolex piscatorum described by Whittard (1953), who recorded this species from the Shumardia pusilla Zone of Sheinton, Shropshire, and from the Dictyonema flabelliforme Zone of Breadstone, Gloucestershire. All Whittard's type material is longer than our specimen, and, probably more significantly, considerably wider (widths varying from 1.0 to 1.4 mm).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A worm known in detail from the British Tremadoc is Palaeoscolex piscatorum described by Whittard (1953), who recorded this species from the Shumardia pusilla Zone of Sheinton, Shropshire, and from the Dictyonema flabelliforme Zone of Breadstone, Gloucestershire. All Whittard's type material is longer than our specimen, and, probably more significantly, considerably wider (widths varying from 1.0 to 1.4 mm).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species with this morphological form are often assigned to the "palaeoscolecids" [20]. Palaeoscolex was originally considered to be an annelid [21]; later Hou et al [4,5,7] recognized the similarities between these three genera and put them into the phylum Nematomorpha based on their elongated body shape; however, due to further research on the proboscis of these animals in recent years, these three genera are now suggested to be closer to priapulids [22,23]. The latest cladistic analysis [24] shows Palaeoscolex to be positioned among the stem priapulids and is grouped with the similarly shaped Tabelliscolex, Cricocosmia, and Tylotites.…”
Section: Chengjiang Priapulidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their first descriptions were based on compressed body fossils (e.g., Conway Robison, 1986, Robison, 1969;Ulrich, 1878;Whittard, 1953). Their disarticulated sclerites were found worldwide as dregs after limestone etching with problems to assign them to specific taxa and were described under different generic names, such as Hadimopanella Gedik, 1977, Kaimenella Märss, 1988and Milaculum Müller, 1973(e.g., Bendix-Almgreen and Peel, 1988Bengtson, 1977;Gedik, 1977Gedik, , 1989Märss, 1988;Peel and Larsen, 1984;van den Boogard, 1983van den Boogard, , 1988van den Boogard, , 1989avan den Boogard, , 1989bWrona, 1982Wrona, , 1987.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%