1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1976.tb00413.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I Love You But I'm Not In Love with You*

Abstract: This paper reports an investigation of the hypothesis that the meaning of love is different for different people.Six distinct concepts of love were isolated by using Smallest Space Analysis procedure. Ideal types of the six different styles of loving were constructed, following the work of Lee. The clinical implications of the findings were discussed, and a procedure for the management of cases involving incongruous concepts of love was proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
4

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Romantic love without obsession and obsessive love by itself were coded from measures including the Eros and Mania subscale, respectively, of the LAS or the similar SAMPLE (Laswell & Laswell, 1976). Romantic love with obsession was coded from the PLS, the Passion subscale of Sternberg's (1997) Triangular Love Scale, and similar measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Romantic love without obsession and obsessive love by itself were coded from measures including the Eros and Mania subscale, respectively, of the LAS or the similar SAMPLE (Laswell & Laswell, 1976). Romantic love with obsession was coded from the PLS, the Passion subscale of Sternberg's (1997) Triangular Love Scale, and similar measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale is a modification of a true-false scale that was developed earlier (Lasswell & Lasswell, 1976). In the Love Attitudes Scale, each love style is assessed with 7 items.…”
Section: Measurement Of Compassionate Lovementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the question of love is often seen as "lying within the realm of social psychology and thus taken for granted in a way that belies the underlying ideology of family and the gendered nature of relationships within society" (Edgar & Glezer, 1994, p. 117). With some exceptions (e.g., Lasswell & Lasswell, 1976;Montgomery & Sorell, 1997), family scientists who study intimate relationships often do not question how perceptions of the concept of love may be dramatically different from one person to the next. What does it mean to "love" someone?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%