2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“I’ll remember this!” Effects of emotionality on memory predictions versus memory performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

18
119
4
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
18
119
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies could also further assess the effects of emotional arousal on agerelated differences in episodic memory for component items and their associations, as well as evaluate the role of changes in the allocation of attention to item and associative memory as a result of emotionally arousing information. Specifically, recent research has suggested that test forms may be differentially sensitive to distinctions between positive and negative materials (Zimmerman & Kelley, 2010); thus, the present study could be replicated with cued or free recall testing to examine young and older adults' sensitivity to positive and negative associations. Additionally, given the gender differences observed in our older adult group, it would also be interesting to consider potential gender differences in metamemory and how gender differences may influence memory performance when monitoring and strategy selection are emphasized (e.g., value-directed remembering; Castel, 2008).…”
Section: Itemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These studies could also further assess the effects of emotional arousal on agerelated differences in episodic memory for component items and their associations, as well as evaluate the role of changes in the allocation of attention to item and associative memory as a result of emotionally arousing information. Specifically, recent research has suggested that test forms may be differentially sensitive to distinctions between positive and negative materials (Zimmerman & Kelley, 2010); thus, the present study could be replicated with cued or free recall testing to examine young and older adults' sensitivity to positive and negative associations. Additionally, given the gender differences observed in our older adult group, it would also be interesting to consider potential gender differences in metamemory and how gender differences may influence memory performance when monitoring and strategy selection are emphasized (e.g., value-directed remembering; Castel, 2008).…”
Section: Itemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Prominent examples are the emotional Stroop (Dresler, Mériau, Heekeren, & van der Meer, 2009;Phaf & Kan, 2007;Thomas, Johnstone, & Gonsalvez, 2007), the recognition memory test (Grider & Malmberg, 2008;Võ et al, 2008;Zimmermann & Kelley, 2010), the lexical decision task (LDT, Kuchinke, Võ, Hofmann, & Jacobs, 2007;Schacht & Sommer, 2009;Scott, O'Donnell, Leuthold, & Sereno, 2009), naming (Estes & Adelman, 2008;Simpson, Snyder, Gusnard, & Raichle, 2001), verb generation (e.g., Simpson et al, 2001), or word-stem completion (Danion, Kauffmann-Muller, Grangé, Zimmermann, & Greth, 1995). However, because numerous variables are known to influence visual word processing (Graf, Nagler, & Jacobs, 2005), well-controlled and reliable emotion-inducing stimulus material is necessary in order to produce interpretable effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the results of our other two experiments and the fact that arousal did not actually influence recall, it seems unlikely that these JOL differences reflect an implicit interpretation of the physiological effects of arousal. Rather, a cognitive explanation is more likely: Higher JOLs for high-arousal words were driven by the contrast to the low-arousal words in the mixed-list design, coupled with participants' belief that these high-arousal experiences would be more memorable than lower-arousal experiences (Tauber & Dunlosky, 2012;Zimmerman & Kelley, 2010).Indeed, Experiment 2 provided strong evidence against an explanation based purely on physiological arousal: Participants gave higher JOLs to negative-valence words than to neutral-valence words, even though both word types had equivalent, moderate levels of arousal. This result rules out a direct effect of physiological arousal and suggests that, instead, participants were likely consciously responding to valence on the basis of its distinctiveness in the discrete-levels, mixed-list context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These competing predictions have not been directly tested. The few studies on metamemory for emotional words (Tauber & Dunlosky, 2012;Zimmerman & Kelley, 2010) have all used mixed-list designs in which the lists were composed of discrete categories of emotional and neutral words, which may have highlighted the emotional words by contrast to the neutral words. One set of studies-those by Tauber and Dunlosky (2012)-did vary the number of categories across experiments (positive, neutral, and negative versus only positive and neutral or only negative and neutral) and found no effect of this variable on JOLs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation