Let’s Talk About Sexism: The Differential Effects of Gender Discrimination on Liberal and Conservative Women’s Political Engagement

Abstract

<jats:p> As the 2016 election season and the Me Too movement have powerfully demonstrated, sexism is a pervasive force not just in American politics but also, more generally, in women’s everyday lives. While political scientists have focused on the impact of sexism on voters’ evaluations of female candidates and their electoral chances, we know little about the effect of personally experienced sexism on American women’s political engagement. This manuscript tries to address this gap. Using data from the 2016 ANES Pilot Study as well as a survey experiment, I demonstrate that women who have experienced gender discrimination report higher levels of political participation and a higher chance of voting in the general election. However, among conservative women, personal experience with sexism is not associated with this participatory impetus. These findings have implications for the equal representation of women from both ends of the ideological spectrum. </jats:p>

We Have It Totally Under Control? Exploring the Effects of Ideology and Knowing Someone Diagnosed With COVID-19 on Evaluations of President Trump’s Leadership on the Pandemic

“…We assert that the likelihood of an individual to engage in motivated reasoning regarding their evaluation of President Trump’s leadership on the pandemic could be conditional. Prior work has identified that gender (Bankert, 2020), political sophistication (Taber & Lodge, 2006), elite polarization (Druckman et al, 2013), opinion strength (Taber & Lodge, 2006), and media coverage (Jerit & Barabas, 2012) can influence a citizen’s tendency to engage in motivational reasoning and can mitigate the impact of a citizen’s ideology. Germane to our research, we argue that knowing someone diagnosed with the novel coronavirus could decrease the effect that a citizen’s ideology has on their evaluation of President Trump’s management of the pandemic.…”

Hostile, Benevolent, Implicit: How Different Shades of Sexism Impact Gendered Policy Attitudes

“…Indeed, women in the electorate are not immune from the influence of sexism in their politics. Personal experiences of sexism and sexual harassment can actually motivate political engagement (Bankert, 2020). Similarly, Hansen and Dolan (2020) find that women who reported being sexual harassed at work were more likely to mobilize.…”

Science Factionalism: How Group Identity Language Affects Public Engagement With Misinformation and Debunking Narratives on a Popular Q&A Platform in China

“…People with strong national identities are more likely to engage in political activities and support muscular responses to national threats (Huddy, 2013). For voting behavior as a most prevalent example in research, increased engagement is found in people highly identifying themselves with certain ethnical groups (Kuo et al, 2017; Towler et al, 2020), gender orientations (Bankert, 2020), and partisan affiliations (Dinas, 2014).…”