2021
DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2021.1976730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les enfants terribles de l’Europe? The ‘Sovereigntist’ Role of the Visegrád Group in the Context of the Migration Crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that more authoritarian respondents express greater distance only towards the group of undesirable immigrants suggests that the latter group, towards which the greatest social distance is expressed, is perceived as a significant realistic and/or symbolic threat. Namely, according to the assumption of the theory of authoritarian dynamics (Stenner 2005), the difference in intolerance between authoritarian and non-authoritarian individuals occur only in situations of normative threat. In such a situation, actors with authoritarian predispositions react with increased intolerance towards those they hold responsible for this threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that more authoritarian respondents express greater distance only towards the group of undesirable immigrants suggests that the latter group, towards which the greatest social distance is expressed, is perceived as a significant realistic and/or symbolic threat. Namely, according to the assumption of the theory of authoritarian dynamics (Stenner 2005), the difference in intolerance between authoritarian and non-authoritarian individuals occur only in situations of normative threat. In such a situation, actors with authoritarian predispositions react with increased intolerance towards those they hold responsible for this threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, since it was first defined about 30 years ago, the V4 group has been subjected to many analyses aimed primarily at tracing the economic transformation in general (e.g., Ambroziak et al 2020;Błaszczyk 2022) and in selected aspects such as catching up in terms of GDP (e.g., Lengyel and Kotosz 2018), innovation (e.g., Dworak and Grzelak 2018;Jabłońska 2020), competitiveness and shaping comparative advantages (e.g., Molendowski 2021), and sustainability (e.g., bio-based production, Lazorcakova et al 2022). The V4 is also subject to research on political issues (e.g., Zapletalová and Komínková 2020; Strnad 2022). Those analyses, apart from the pure macroeconomic studies, were carried out at the regional (Lengyel and Kotosz 2018) or branch level (Jabłońska 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later studies by Csányi (2020) and Frelak (2017) offer a comparative analysis of the positions of individual V4 states on the EU migration and asylum agenda. The topic of migration and asylum in the EU has also become an integral part of the contributions dealing with selected aspects of the functionality of the V4 as a mini-lateral grouping in the European Union (Strnad 2022). Probably the most extensive category of scientific literature dealing with the V4 in the context of EU migration and asylum agenda after 2015 is publications analyzing social, historical, political and other developments that influenced national positions on proposed European solutions to solidarity and cooperation and the long-intended reform of EU Migration and Asylum policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%