<i>JEAB</i>: Past, present, and future

Galizio, Mark

doi:10.1002/jeab.574

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(40 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Readers of this editorial should feel free to recall their own favorite examples of beautiful science from past JEAB issues. In common with many of the previous chief editors, as noted in their editorials (e.g., Galizio, 2020), I too have been a JEAB reader for many years. The first articles I read were those at the end of chapters in Howard Rachlin's excellent book Behavior and Learning (Rachlin, 1976), the textbook for the Learning course that I completed as an undergraduate student in Psychology.…”

Section: The Jeab Review Process and The Team Making Publications Happenmentioning

confidence: 77%

Editorial: Process and progress

Mitchell

2024

J Exper Analysis Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Jeab Review Process and The Team Making Publications Happenmentioning

confidence: 77%

Editorial: Process and progress

Mitchell

2024

J Exper Analysis Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior ( JEAB ) serves as an important publication outlet for basic and translational behavior‐analytic research (Galizio, 2020), and because of this, it is an ideal journal for research dedicated to gender diversity. There are innumerable important methodological, conceptual, and applied research questions related to gender diversity.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An experimental analysis of gender‐biased verbal behavior and self‐editing using an online chat analog

Oda

Lechago

Silva

et al. 2022

J Exper Analysis Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study investigated the effects of female and male audiences on gender‐biased verbal behavior and self‐editing using an online chat environment analog. The chat analog allowed access to self‐editing behaviors, which are frequently covert, thus providing additional information about verbal episodes. We examined whether the strength and the dimensions of verbal responses differentially varied across the female and male audience conditions using visual inspection and statistical analysis. Participants were 28 typically developing adults. Overt responses were recorded for interrupting, and both overt and covert responses were recorded for disagreeing, pressuring, and self‐editing. Visual inspection revealed differentiated overt and covert disagreeing, pressuring, and interrupting for some participants, while statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test did not reveal significant differences in the dependent variables between audience's perceived gender and participants' gender. Differentiated responding between female and male audiences suggests that perceived gender can exert stimulus control over a speaker's behavior. Although we didn't observe consistent gender‐biased responding for all the participants, our experimental evaluation functions as a proof‐of‐concept study that can encourage the use of this methodology to study complex social behavior.

show abstract