2024
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Process and progress

Suzanne H. Mitchell
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent examples include systematic reviews of the naming literature (Sivaraman & Barnes-Holmes, 2023) and basic and preclinical studies of resurgence (Podlesnik et al, 2023). The benefit of using reporting guidelines is they reduce researcher bias while adding transparency and replicability to the research process (Plint et al, 2006;Simera et al, 2010; see also the recent JEAB editorial by Mitchell, 2024). Open science is also related to increasing transparency, accessibility, and replicability and minimizing bias in research (Gilroy, 2023).…”
Section: How We Askmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent examples include systematic reviews of the naming literature (Sivaraman & Barnes-Holmes, 2023) and basic and preclinical studies of resurgence (Podlesnik et al, 2023). The benefit of using reporting guidelines is they reduce researcher bias while adding transparency and replicability to the research process (Plint et al, 2006;Simera et al, 2010; see also the recent JEAB editorial by Mitchell, 2024). Open science is also related to increasing transparency, accessibility, and replicability and minimizing bias in research (Gilroy, 2023).…”
Section: How We Askmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This toolkit includes information for encouraging the use of diverse samples, research designs that are well suited for social justice studies, inclusive reporting standards, data sharing and preregistration (i.e., open science), improving diversity on editorial boards, minimizing bias in the review process, and bias-free language. Although not part of APA Publishing, journals published by the Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (SEAB) and ABAI should consider adopting the suggestions provided in this toolkit (see Mitchell, 2024).…”
Section: Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%