2013
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy

Abstract: Measuring the stiffness of the cervix might be useful in the prediction of preterm delivery or successful induction of labor. For that purpose, a variety of methods for quantitative determination of physical properties of the pregnant cervix have been developed. Herein, we review studies on the clinical application of these new techniques. They are based on the quantification of mechanical, optical, or electrical properties associated with increased hydration and loss of organization in collagen structure. Qua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
40
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The CCI is a reproducible measurement, although the force applied to the tissue is also unknown [28] . The quantitative measure is calculated as the ratio between the anteroposterior diameter at maximum compression and the diameter at rest [29] . The CCI has shown a clear inverse linear relationship with gestational age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCI is a reproducible measurement, although the force applied to the tissue is also unknown [28] . The quantitative measure is calculated as the ratio between the anteroposterior diameter at maximum compression and the diameter at rest [29] . The CCI has shown a clear inverse linear relationship with gestational age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the cervical end of the uterus is assumed to be fixed in all directions. In reality the cervix is a compliant structure (Badir et al 2013;Mazza et al 2014;Briggs et al 2015;Myers et al 2015), and a more realistic, but still simple, boundary condition would be to assume a linearly elastic support. Numerical experiments using data from Badir et al (2013, Fig 11) indicate that the IUP remains relatively unchanged by this condition, but unphysiological oscillations in the displacement of the uterine wall led to the conclusion that this approach needs further work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More experimental data would be useful to restrict the possible ranges of parameters in the model. This include geometrical data such as USM and collagen fibers architecture, which can be obtained noninvasively (Weiss et al 2006), and mechanical properties of the cervix (Badir et al 2013;Mazza et al 2014) for implementation of more realistic boundary conditions. A detailed statistical sensitivity analysis for the simulation is also desirable, possibly using response surface methodology (Myers et al 2009) as a way of reducing the amount of time spent on FE simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical integrity of the tissue is in part attributable to the preferred directionality of its collagen fibers [3]. Mechanical properties of human cervical tissue have been previously measured using standard uni-axial compress/tension tests [4,5], indentation [6], permeability tests [7], and aspiration [8][9][10]. During pregnancy, the cervix becomes softer to accommodate delivery [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%