2011
DOI: 10.1179/1743132811y.0000000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitroandin vivosurgical and MRI evidence to clarify the effectiveness of the vascular tunnel technique in the course of decompressive craniectomy

Abstract: The in vivo case study and the cadaver experiment suggest that vascular protection helps prevent secondary venous infarction after DC. This is therefore an aid in preventing further injury and cerebral oedema. The vascular tunnel guarantees the efficacy of DC even at a high level of intracranial pressure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-The possible efficacy of a vascular protection during DC, has been highlighted to reduce the risk of secondary venous infarction due to the blocking pressure for venous outflow through bridging veins. This method may improve regional CBF after DC, and further impairment of CSF circulation even at a high level of ICP 17 .…”
Section: Surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…-The possible efficacy of a vascular protection during DC, has been highlighted to reduce the risk of secondary venous infarction due to the blocking pressure for venous outflow through bridging veins. This method may improve regional CBF after DC, and further impairment of CSF circulation even at a high level of ICP 17 .…”
Section: Surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%