Abstract:We re-evaluated several antibiotics including newer ones, for their in vitro killing activity, as well as their inhibitory activity, against clinical isolates of periodontopathic bacteria. Tetracyclines were active against Porphyromonas gingivalis, and were highly active against Prevotella intermedia, but demonstrated only a low killing activity against Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Rokitamycin, a new macrolide, and clindamycin were highly active against P. gingivalis and P. intermedia, but showed very… Show more
“…The MNCCs of eight test agents were: 0.3 µ m for minocycline, 1 µ m for tetracycline, 3 µ m for ofloxacin and erythromycin, 10 µ m for enoxacin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin, and 100 µ m for roxythromycin. The MIC 90 concentrations of these test agents, except enoxacin, for periodontopathic bacteria, including P. gingivalis , P. intermedia , and A. actinomycetemcomitans , range from 0.031 to 2 µg/ml (0.06–4.0 µ m ) for minocycline, from 0.25 to 4 µg/ml (0.5–8.3 µ m ) for tetracycline, from 0.063 to 1 µg/ml (0.2–2.8 µ m ) for ofloxacin, from 0.125 to 16 µg/ml (0.2–21.8 µ m ) for erythromycin, from 0.125 to 4 µg/ml (0.2–5.3 µ m ) for clarithromycin, from 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml (0.7–2.7 µ m ) for azithromycin, and from 0.25 to 4 µg/ml (0.3–4.8 µ m ) for roxythromycin (3, 29–31). The results suggest that there would be little or no growth inhibitory effect on basal epithelial cells if ofloxacin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxythromycin were topically administered to the periodontal pocket at the MIC 90 doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum concentrations for the fluoroquinolones were: 10 µ m for tosufloxacin, 30 µ m for sparfloxacin and enoxacin, 100 µ m for lomefloxacin, and 300 µ m for ofloxacin. The MIC 90 , the concentrations required to inhibit the growth of 90% of periodontopathic bacteria, including Porphyromonas gingivalis , Prevotella intermedia , and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans , were 0.06–8 µ m for tetracycline and minocycline and 0.05–5 µ m for tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ofloxacin (3). When extrapolated from the concentration–response curves, the relative survivals of Pel cells exposed to the macrolides at the MIC 90 concentrations were estimated to be: ≥ 53.8% for rokitamycin, ≥ 92.7% for roxithromycin, ≥ 94.6% for clarithromycin, ≥ 97.1% for azithromycin, and ≥ 86.2% for erythromycin (7).…”
These results suggest that little, if any, adverse effects on growth, differentiation, and adhesion of basal epithelial cells would be expected with topical administration of clarithromycin, ofloxacin or azithromycin to the periodontal pocket at a dose equivalent to the MIC90. It is important to note, however, that the extrapolation of these findings to in vivo conditions has yet to be undertaken.
“…The MNCCs of eight test agents were: 0.3 µ m for minocycline, 1 µ m for tetracycline, 3 µ m for ofloxacin and erythromycin, 10 µ m for enoxacin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin, and 100 µ m for roxythromycin. The MIC 90 concentrations of these test agents, except enoxacin, for periodontopathic bacteria, including P. gingivalis , P. intermedia , and A. actinomycetemcomitans , range from 0.031 to 2 µg/ml (0.06–4.0 µ m ) for minocycline, from 0.25 to 4 µg/ml (0.5–8.3 µ m ) for tetracycline, from 0.063 to 1 µg/ml (0.2–2.8 µ m ) for ofloxacin, from 0.125 to 16 µg/ml (0.2–21.8 µ m ) for erythromycin, from 0.125 to 4 µg/ml (0.2–5.3 µ m ) for clarithromycin, from 0.5 to 2.0 µg/ml (0.7–2.7 µ m ) for azithromycin, and from 0.25 to 4 µg/ml (0.3–4.8 µ m ) for roxythromycin (3, 29–31). The results suggest that there would be little or no growth inhibitory effect on basal epithelial cells if ofloxacin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxythromycin were topically administered to the periodontal pocket at the MIC 90 doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum concentrations for the fluoroquinolones were: 10 µ m for tosufloxacin, 30 µ m for sparfloxacin and enoxacin, 100 µ m for lomefloxacin, and 300 µ m for ofloxacin. The MIC 90 , the concentrations required to inhibit the growth of 90% of periodontopathic bacteria, including Porphyromonas gingivalis , Prevotella intermedia , and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans , were 0.06–8 µ m for tetracycline and minocycline and 0.05–5 µ m for tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ofloxacin (3). When extrapolated from the concentration–response curves, the relative survivals of Pel cells exposed to the macrolides at the MIC 90 concentrations were estimated to be: ≥ 53.8% for rokitamycin, ≥ 92.7% for roxithromycin, ≥ 94.6% for clarithromycin, ≥ 97.1% for azithromycin, and ≥ 86.2% for erythromycin (7).…”
These results suggest that little, if any, adverse effects on growth, differentiation, and adhesion of basal epithelial cells would be expected with topical administration of clarithromycin, ofloxacin or azithromycin to the periodontal pocket at a dose equivalent to the MIC90. It is important to note, however, that the extrapolation of these findings to in vivo conditions has yet to be undertaken.
“…Several studies have shown that tetracyclines are active against A. actinomycetemcomitans (15,17,23). Tetracyclines are extensively used as adjuncts in the treatment of periodontitis, a disease affecting the tooth-supporting tissues (gingiva, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone) and resulting in tooth loss (21,23).…”
Three tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline) were found to possess iron-chelating activity in a colorimetric siderophore assay. Determination of MICs indicated that the activity of doxycycline against the periodontopathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans was only slightly influenced by the presence of an excess of iron that likely saturates the antibiotic. On the other hand, the MICs of doxycycline and minocycline were significantly lower for A. actinomycetemcomitans cultivated under iron-poor conditions than under ironrich conditions.
“…originate from anaerobic bacteria, which are particularly sensitive to metronidazole. 21,22 To our knowledge, among the international english literature, metronidazole has yet never been experimented for this procedure. 23,24 Metronidazole is an antibiotic which belongs to the nitro-5-imidazole group.…”
A possible correlation may exist between the occurrence of non homogeneities within the bone grafts and the anaerobic bacterial contamination. The local use of a very small quantity of metronidazole (equivalent to only 1/20 of a common 200 mg oral tablet) could provide more security when performing sinus-lift procedures and an improved quality of the graft. This protocol should not be considered as an antibiotherapy, but only as way to limit the initial contamination of bone graft.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.