2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c06756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Thermal Conductivity Measurement of Single-Crystal Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 by Raman-Resistance Temperature Detectors Method

Abstract: The thermal conductivity measurement of metal−organic frameworks (MOFs), which plays an important role in thermal management of MOF-based gas separation, storage, and thermal energy conversion (e.g., adsorption heat pumps), has been a challenging task for decades. However, the direct thermal conductivity measurement of a single-crystal MOF is currently limited by their small crystal sizes, since no sophisticated approach has ever been reported. In this study, the Raman-resistance temperature detectors (Raman-R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 The measured thermal conductivities of ZIF-8 (i.e., 0.326 W m −1 K −1 ), 11 UiO-66 (i.e., 0.11 W m −1 K −1 ), 13 UiO-67 (i.e., 0.19 W m −1 K −1 ), 13 Cu-BTC (i.e., 0.39 W m −1 K −1 ), 13 and perovskite-like MOF-1 (i.e., 1.3 W m −1 K −1 ) 14 at room temperature are commonly low. Due to the limitation of the conventional steady-state measurement, it is very challenging to directly obtain the thermal conductivity of a single MOF crystal with a size below several millimeters 15 by excluding the thermal contact resistance between MOF crystals. Therefore, current thermal conductivity measurement techniques cannot satisfy our requirements to reveal the microscale heat transfer mechanism within MOF frameworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The measured thermal conductivities of ZIF-8 (i.e., 0.326 W m −1 K −1 ), 11 UiO-66 (i.e., 0.11 W m −1 K −1 ), 13 UiO-67 (i.e., 0.19 W m −1 K −1 ), 13 Cu-BTC (i.e., 0.39 W m −1 K −1 ), 13 and perovskite-like MOF-1 (i.e., 1.3 W m −1 K −1 ) 14 at room temperature are commonly low. Due to the limitation of the conventional steady-state measurement, it is very challenging to directly obtain the thermal conductivity of a single MOF crystal with a size below several millimeters 15 by excluding the thermal contact resistance between MOF crystals. Therefore, current thermal conductivity measurement techniques cannot satisfy our requirements to reveal the microscale heat transfer mechanism within MOF frameworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared with the gas adsorption property, the study of the thermal transport in SPCs is still in its very early stage. To date, only the thermal conductivity of some conventional SPCs such as MOF-5, ZIF-8, and HKUST-1 ,, has been investigated in detail by experimental or computational approaches, while the thermal transport properties of the aforementioned DUT series still remain unknown. In addition, the existing studies mainly focus on the influence of gas and water adsorption, , framework architecture, ,, defects, and physical environment including pressure and temperature on the thermal conductivity of SPCs; little attention has been paid to the evolution of the thermal transport properties of SPCs during their dynamic process, i.e., the phase transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By taking advantage of the excellent electrical conductivity of MXenes and the extremely large surface area of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), three-dimensional MOFs@MXene composites were prepared, which allowed us to amplify the transduced electrochemical signal following biorecognition to improve the assay sensitivity. Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (i.e., ZIF-8) were used here due to their high thermal and chemical stability . We further demonstrated the utility of the SAE-nChip for bioaerosol detection in a practical context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%