2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.97.185702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In SituImaging of Field-Induced Hexagonal Columns in Magnetite Ferrofluids

Abstract: Field-induced structures in a ferrofluid with well-defined magnetite nanoparticles with a permanent magnetic dipole moment are analyzed on a single-particle level by in situ cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (2D). The field-induced columnar phase locally exhibits hexagonal symmetry and confirms the structures observed in simulations for ferromagnetic dipolar fluids in 2D. The columns are distorted by lens-shaped voids, due to the weak interchain attraction relative to field-directed dipole-dipole attr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
170
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
170
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surfactant adsorption apparently strongly depends on how the nanoparticles are prepared, since a plateau is reached at significantly lower concentration by Dubois et al [6], and complete desorption is observed at low surfactant concentrations by Korolev et al [7], in contrast to our findings and those of Dubois et al [6]. The presence of a fractional monolayer is supported by other techniques: both from statistical analysis of the particle-particle contact distance observed by TEM [11] and from small angle neutron scattering (SANS) [30], a surfactant layer of about 2 nm thickness was deduced. This agrees with the layer thickness expected from the size of the surfactant molecules on the basis of monolayer coverage of the as-prepared nanoparticles by surfactant molecules attached perpendicular to the surface.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Surfactant adsorption apparently strongly depends on how the nanoparticles are prepared, since a plateau is reached at significantly lower concentration by Dubois et al [6], and complete desorption is observed at low surfactant concentrations by Korolev et al [7], in contrast to our findings and those of Dubois et al [6]. The presence of a fractional monolayer is supported by other techniques: both from statistical analysis of the particle-particle contact distance observed by TEM [11] and from small angle neutron scattering (SANS) [30], a surfactant layer of about 2 nm thickness was deduced. This agrees with the layer thickness expected from the size of the surfactant molecules on the basis of monolayer coverage of the as-prepared nanoparticles by surfactant molecules attached perpendicular to the surface.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Spontaneous chaining in zero field and coexistence of chains segments with hexagonal ordered domains has been observed when the magnetic field was increased [26]. Similar distorted hexagonal structures have been observed in Magnetite based ferrofluids by applying magnetic fields [43,45].…”
Section: Particle Correlations Induced By Magnetic Fieldssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Two types of ferrofluids with nearly monodisperse nanoparticles have been investigated, namely concentrated Co-ferrofluid ("MFT3") [26,39,44] with a cobalt core of radius R c = 4.4 nm dispersed in a viscous synthetic hydrocarbon oil "Edwards L9" (monoalkylnaphthalene) and magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) particles of R c = 8.5 nm dispersed in decalin [43,45] both stabilised by a surfactant layer of a thickness D of about 2 nm. The maximal dipolar interaction energy E dd (max) for particles with saturation magnetisation M sat in head-to-tail conformation and closest contact = 2(R c + D) is given by…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in the field of materials science, CEM is becoming an established way to visualize fragile structures at the nanoscale [18]. We have introduced CEM before to image nanoparticle structures in colloidal dispersions, be it only in two dimensions [19][20][21][22]. Here, the sample structure is obtained in three dimensions using tomography [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%