2010
DOI: 10.1051/sfn/201011013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic correlations in magnetic nanomaterials studied by small angle neutron scattering techniques

Abstract: Abstract. The performance of new techniques developed for Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) is illustrated by investigations on magnetic colloids. Polarised neutrons ("SANSPOL") are introduced as a special type of contrast variation for magnetic systems. Examples of diluted magnetic systems are reviewed where low magnetic contrasts had to be analysed beside strong nuclear contributions or vice versa. In Ferrofluids magnetic core-shell composite particles and magnetic aggregates could be precisely evaluated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the approach of combining micromagnetic and SANS simulations complements experiments, which provide a weighted sum of Fourier components, a fact which often hampers the straightforward interpretation of experimental SANS data. While it is in principle possible to determine some Fourier coefficients separately, e.g., through the application of a saturating magnetic field or by exploiting the neutron polarization degree of freedom via SANSPOL or POLARIS methods (e.g., Honecker et al, 2010 andWiedenmann, 2010), it is difficult to unambiguously determine a particular scattering contribution without "contamination" by unwanted Fourier components. For instance, when the applied field is not large enough to completely saturate the sample, then the scattering of unpolarized neutrons along the field direction does not represent the pure nuclear SANS, but contains also the magnetic SANS due to the misaligned spins (Bischof et al, 2007).…”
Section: B Simulation Of Magnetic Neutron Scattering: Decrypting Sanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the approach of combining micromagnetic and SANS simulations complements experiments, which provide a weighted sum of Fourier components, a fact which often hampers the straightforward interpretation of experimental SANS data. While it is in principle possible to determine some Fourier coefficients separately, e.g., through the application of a saturating magnetic field or by exploiting the neutron polarization degree of freedom via SANSPOL or POLARIS methods (e.g., Honecker et al, 2010 andWiedenmann, 2010), it is difficult to unambiguously determine a particular scattering contribution without "contamination" by unwanted Fourier components. For instance, when the applied field is not large enough to completely saturate the sample, then the scattering of unpolarized neutrons along the field direction does not represent the pure nuclear SANS, but contains also the magnetic SANS due to the misaligned spins (Bischof et al, 2007).…”
Section: B Simulation Of Magnetic Neutron Scattering: Decrypting Sanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] The measurable quantity in a magnetic SANS experiment-the (energyintegrated) macroscopic differential scattering cross section d /d -depends on the Fourier coefficients of M(r). These Fourier coefficients M(q) depend in a complicated manner on the magnetic interactions, the underlying microstructure (e.g., particle-size distribution and crystallographic texture), and on the applied magnetic field.…”
Section: And References Therein)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard references for nuclear (nonmagnetic) SANS and SAXS are the well-known textbooks by Guinier and Fournet (1955), Glatter and Kratky (1982), Feigin and Svergun (1987), Svergun et al (2013), and Gille (2014). For reviews on various topics of small-angle scattering, for instance, on polymers, disordered and porous materials, colloidal systems, ferrofluids, magnetic materials, superconductors, ceramics, biological structures, and precipitates in metallic alloys and composites, see Schmatz et al (1974), Jacrot (1976), Gerold and Kostorz (1978), Higgins and Stein (1978), Schelten and Hendricks (1978), Chen and Lin (1987), Martin and Hurd (1987), Bates (1988), Chen et al (1988), Hayter (1988), Page (1988), Kostorz (1991Kostorz ( , 2014, Schmidt (1991), Pedersen (1997), Wiedenmann (2002Wiedenmann ( , 2010, Fratzl (2003), Svergun and Koch (2003), Thiyagarajan (2003), Fitzsimmons et al (2004), Radlinski et al (2004), Stuhrmann (2004), Allen (2005), Wagner and Kohlbrecher (2005), Wignall and Melnichenko (2005), Fritz and Glatter (2006), Melnichenko and Wignall (2007), Michels and Weissmüller (2008), Avdeev and Aksenov (2010), Hammouda (2010), Eskilds...…”
Section: (Published 4 March 2019)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the approach of combining micromagnetic and SANS simulations complements experiments, which provide a weighted sum of Fourier components, a fact which often hampers the straightforward interpretation of experimental SANS data. While it is in principle possible to determine some Fourier coefficients separately, e.g., through the application of a saturating magnetic field or by exploiting the neutron-polarization degree of freedom via SANSPOL or POLARIS methods [see, e.g., Honecker et al (2010) and Wiedenmann (2010)], it is difficult to unambiguously determine a particular scattering contribution without "contamination" by unwanted Fourier components. For instance, when the applied field is not large enough to completely saturate the sample, then the scattering of unpolarized neutrons along the field direction does not represent the pure nuclear SANS, but contains also the magnetic SANS due to the misaligned spins (Bischof et al, 2007).…”
Section: B Simulation Of Magnetic Neutron Scattering: Decrypting Sans Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%