<i>Gisekia</i> (Gisekiaceae): Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography, and ecophysiology of a poorly known C<sub>4</sub> lineage in the Caryophyllales

Bissinger, Kerstin; Khoshravesh, Roxana; Kotrade, Jan Peter; Oakley, Jason C.; Sage, Tammy L.; Sage, Rowan F.; Hartmann, H. E. K.; Kadereit, Gudrun

doi:10.3732/ajb.1300279

Cited by 11 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In APG III (), these included Barbeuiaceae, Gisekiaceae, Lophiocarpaceae and Stegnospermataceae. Most recent studies (Brockington et al ., , ; Bissinger et al ., ) have found that subfamily Rivinoideae of Phytolacaccaeae are sister to Nyctaginaceae, and we propose here to accept them at the family level (Petiveriaceae, including Rivinaceae) to maintain the previous use of family names in this larger clade. The priority of Petiveriaceae C.Agardh 1824 over Rivinaceae C.Agardh 1824 was established by Meisner (), who combined the tribes Rivineae Dumort.…”

Section: Superasteridsmentioning

confidence: 77%

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

2016

Bot. J. Linn. Soc.

4,774

771

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) classification of the orders and families of angiosperms is presented. Several new orders are recognized: Boraginales, Dilleniales, Icacinales, Metteniusiales and Vahliales. This brings the total number of orders and families recognized in the APG system to 64 and 416, respectively. We propose two additional informal major clades, superrosids and superasterids, that each comprise the additional orders that are included in the larger clades dominated by the rosids and asterids. Families that made up potentially monofamilial orders, Dasypogonaceae and Sabiaceae, are instead referred to Arecales and Proteales, respectively. Two parasitic families formerly of uncertain positions are now placed: Cynomoriaceae in Saxifragales and Apodanthaceae in Cucurbitales. Although there is evidence that some families recognized in APG III are not monophyletic, we make no changes in Dioscoreales and Santalales relative to APG III and leave some genera in Lamiales unplaced (e.g. Peltanthera). These changes in familial circumscription and recognition have all resulted from new results published since APG III, except for some changes simply due to nomenclatural issues, which include substituting Asphodelaceae for Xanthorrhoeaceae (Asparagales) and Francoaceae for Melianthaceae (Geraniales); however, in Francoaceae we also include Bersamaceae, Ledocarpaceae, Rhynchothecaceae and Vivianiaceae. Other changes to family limits are not drastic or numerous and are mostly focused on some members of the lamiids, especially the former Icacinaceae that have long been problematic with several genera moved to the formerly monogeneric Metteniusaceae, but minor changes in circumscription include Aristolochiaceae (now including Lactoridaceae and Hydnoraceae; Aristolochiales), Maundiaceae (removed from Juncaginaceae; Alismatales), Restionaceae (now re‐including Anarthriaceae and Centrolepidaceae; Poales), Buxaceae (now including Haptanthaceae; Buxales), Peraceae (split from Euphorbiaceae; Malpighiales), recognition of Petenaeaceae (Huerteales), Kewaceae, Limeaceae, Macarthuriaceae and Microteaceae (all Caryophyllales), Petiveriaceae split from Phytolaccaceae (Caryophyllales), changes to the generic composition of Ixonanthaceae and Irvingiaceae (with transfer of Allantospermum from the former to the latter; Malpighiales), transfer of Pakaraimaea (formerly Dipterocarpaceae) to Cistaceae (Malvales), transfer of Borthwickia, Forchhammeria, Stixis and Tirania (formerly all Capparaceae) to Resedaceae (Brassicales), Nyssaceae split from Cornaceae (Cornales), Pteleocarpa moved to Gelsemiaceae (Gentianales), changes to the generic composition of Gesneriaceae (Sanango moved from Loganiaceae) and Orobanchaceae (now including Lindenbergiaceae and Rehmanniaceae) and recognition of Mazaceae distinct from Phrymaceae (all Lamiales).

show abstract

Section: Superasteridsmentioning

confidence: 77%

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

2016

Bot. J. Linn. Soc.

4,774

771

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Family delimitation of the clade that includes Phytolaccaceae and Nyctaginaceae is still unclear. Most recent studies (Brockington et al ., ; Bissinger et al ., ) found Gisekia L. (formerly in Phytolaccaceae or Molluginaceae) to be sister to a clade with Nyctaginaceae, Phytolaccaceae and Sarcobataceae. Furthermore Phytolaccaceae were found to be paraphyletic, with Rivinoideae sister to Nyctaginaceae instead of the rest of Phytolaccaceae, which could result in the recognition of Rivinaceae as separate from Phytolaccaceae.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Results from an online survey of family delimitation in angiosperms and ferns: recommendations to the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group for thorny problems in plant classification

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) started with ordinal relationships for angiosperm families and later came to concentrate more on issues surrounding family delimitation, generally taking a conservative approach (favouring lumping over splitting when choices were otherwise fairly evenly balanced). The history of the APG approach to classification is elaborated here, and long‐term trends in taxon size are also discussed. Twenty‐three questions relating to family delimitation of angiosperms (21) and ferns (two) were identified, and an open, web‐based survey was conducted to determine which solutions were preferred by the botanical community. There were a total of 441 responses from 42 countries. The full survey results are presented and discussed. In general, among respondents, there was a good balance between lumping and splitting, although a much smaller percentage self‐identified as splitters. Recommendations to APG for a set of specific family delimitation issues in angiosperms and ferns are made. We followed the majority vote in all but four cases and recommended ten splitting and 13 lumping options. We found that decisions were made by respondents on a case‐by‐case basis. Many respondents favoured lumping as a means of gaining stability by leaving circumscription issues at the lower taxonomic levels, which are of more concern to specialists (i.e. at subfamilial and tribal levels). We estimate that APG IV will not differ substantially from APG III. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 178, 501–528.

show abstract

“…Kuntze, Delosperma cooperi L. Bolus). Furthermore, Phytolacca dioica L. (Phytolaccaceae) was used as an outgroup according to the results of Christin et al (2011) and Bissinger et al (2014). Table 1 presents sequences generated for this study and downloaded accessions from GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).…”

Section: Sequencing and Phylogenetic Inferencementioning

confidence: 99%

Phylogeny of Sesuvioideae (Aizoaceae) – Biogeography, leaf anatomy and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis

Bohley

Joos

Hartmann³

et al. 2015

Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gisekia (Gisekiaceae): Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography, and ecophysiology of a poorly known C₄ lineage in the Caryophyllales

Cited by 11 publications

References 45 publications

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

Results from an online survey of family delimitation in angiosperms and ferns: recommendations to the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group for thorny problems in plant classification

Phylogeny of Sesuvioideae (Aizoaceae) – Biogeography, leaf anatomy and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Gisekia (Gisekiaceae): Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography, and ecophysiology of a poorly known C4 lineage in the Caryophyllales

Cited by 11 publications

References 45 publications

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

Results from an online survey of family delimitation in angiosperms and ferns: recommendations to the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group for thorny problems in plant classification

Phylogeny of Sesuvioideae (Aizoaceae) – Biogeography, leaf anatomy and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Gisekia (Gisekiaceae): Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography, and ecophysiology of a poorly known C₄ lineage in the Caryophyllales