Abstract:No cross-resistance could be observed with antibiotics when MICs to preservatives were increased; however, a decrease in the disinfectants bactericidal effects was confirmed in preservative-tolerant strains. This will impact industry disinfection strategies treatment against bacteria.
“…An adaptative mechanism probably occurred in the isolate, enabling it to overcome growth inhibition by the protective ingredients we tested. A similar adaptation was already reported for P. gergoviae inoculated in various cosmetics containing frequently used preservatives (Périamé et al, 2014, 2015).…”
Aims
The absence of objectionable micro‐organisms in cosmetics and the efficiency of preservatives are still mainly assessed by time‐consuming cultivation‐based methods. We explored the applicability of real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and reported on the behaviour of different bacteria in artificially contaminated creams.
Methods and results
Real‐time qPCR on DNA from Burkholderia cepacia, Pluribacter gergoviae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sphingomonas paucimobilis identified specific primer pairs that amplify accurately and efficiently two strains/isolates of each species. Using DNeasy mericon Food Kit, we detected bacterial growth in an inoculated cosmetic cream and persistency of DNA from heat‐inactivated bacteria. We were also able to monitor the growth inhibitory effect of caprylyl glycol and EDTA, also showing how different bacterial species interact depending on the presence/absence of these ingredients. Finally, creams supplemented with the protective cosmetic ingredients revealed the various behaviour of five strains/isolates from P. aeruginosa.
Conclusions
Successfully extracting bacterial DNA from artificially contaminated cosmetic creams, we could perform real‐time qPCR to identify and follow the growth of various strains of 4 bacteria species under different conditions.
Significance and impact of the study
Real‐time qPCR appears as a promising method to detect bacterial contamination in cosmetic creams and/or to monitor growth inhibition by ingredients.
“…An adaptative mechanism probably occurred in the isolate, enabling it to overcome growth inhibition by the protective ingredients we tested. A similar adaptation was already reported for P. gergoviae inoculated in various cosmetics containing frequently used preservatives (Périamé et al, 2014, 2015).…”
Aims
The absence of objectionable micro‐organisms in cosmetics and the efficiency of preservatives are still mainly assessed by time‐consuming cultivation‐based methods. We explored the applicability of real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and reported on the behaviour of different bacteria in artificially contaminated creams.
Methods and results
Real‐time qPCR on DNA from Burkholderia cepacia, Pluribacter gergoviae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sphingomonas paucimobilis identified specific primer pairs that amplify accurately and efficiently two strains/isolates of each species. Using DNeasy mericon Food Kit, we detected bacterial growth in an inoculated cosmetic cream and persistency of DNA from heat‐inactivated bacteria. We were also able to monitor the growth inhibitory effect of caprylyl glycol and EDTA, also showing how different bacterial species interact depending on the presence/absence of these ingredients. Finally, creams supplemented with the protective cosmetic ingredients revealed the various behaviour of five strains/isolates from P. aeruginosa.
Conclusions
Successfully extracting bacterial DNA from artificially contaminated cosmetic creams, we could perform real‐time qPCR to identify and follow the growth of various strains of 4 bacteria species under different conditions.
Significance and impact of the study
Real‐time qPCR appears as a promising method to detect bacterial contamination in cosmetic creams and/or to monitor growth inhibition by ingredients.
“…Recently, however, ESBL type SHV and carbapenemase type (IMP or KPC) producers were described in this species (113). With regard to biocides, due to membrane modifications, esterase production, and the modulation of enzymes involved in oxidative detoxification, this species has a natural resistance to the parabens, triclosan, and methylisothiazolinonechloromethylisothiazolinone (MIT-CMIT), which are preservatives used in this type of product (114,115). Such results explain the ability of this species to contaminate cosmetics from a source probably of unknown plant origin (116,117).…”
SUMMARY
The genus Enterobacter is a member of the ESKAPE group, which contains the major resistant bacterial pathogens. First described in 1960, this group member has proven to be more complex as a result of the exponential evolution of phenotypic and genotypic methods. Today, 22 species belong to the Enterobacter genus. These species are described in the environment and have been reported as opportunistic pathogens in plants, animals, and humans. The pathogenicity/virulence of this bacterium remains rather unclear due to the limited amount of work performed to date in this field. In contrast, its resistance against antibacterial agents has been extensively studied. In the face of antibiotic treatment, it is able to manage different mechanisms of resistance via various local and global regulator genes and the modulation of the expression of different proteins, including enzymes (β-lactamases, etc.) or membrane transporters, such as porins and efflux pumps. During various hospital outbreaks, the Enterobacter aerogenes and E. cloacae complex exhibited a multidrug-resistant phenotype, which has stimulated questions about the role of cascade regulation in the emergence of these well-adapted clones.
“…Besides a case of two patients with recurrent corneal erosion, syndrome connected with the usage of lenses colonized by E. gergoviae was reported . However, the problem of cosmetics’ contamination by E. gergoviae is widely described in the literature in the context of the adaptation of this species to preservatives commonly used in the cosmetics industry …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 However, the problem of cosmetics' contamination by E. gergoviae is widely described in the literature in the context of the adaptation of this species to preservatives commonly used in the cosmetics industry. 39,40 One unanticipated finding was that most of the microbiologically contaminated cosmetics registered in the Rapex system originated from European countries. This finding is contrary to our previous research on skin-lightening products, characterized mainly with chemical risks, registered in the same system, where most of the products originated from non-European countries.…”
Background
Although cosmetic products are not expected to be fully aseptic, their potential microbiological contamination might be dangerous, especially for immunocompromised patients. The extent of such contamination of cosmetics in Europe is poorly studied.
Objectives
The objective of this study was to explore whether microbiologically contaminated cosmetic products are available for sale in Europe and what type of contamination was reported.
Methods
We searched the European Union Rapid Information System for dangerous non‐food products (Rapex), a database of non‐compliant products among 31 European countries, to identify microbiologically contaminated cosmetics reported between 2005 and 2018, and present a detailed summary of these notifications.
Results
In the years 2005–2018, 104 reports on microbiologically contaminated cosmetics were identified. Twenty of them were products for children. The majority of the products (65.38%) were produced in Rapex member states. In most cases, contamination was caused by Gram‐negative bacteria (59.62%), mostly Pseudomonas spp. (35.58%) and Enterobacter spp. (11.54%).
Conclusions
Gram‐negative rod‐shaped bacteria are the most common microbiota contaminating cosmetic products in Europe. Most of the reported microbiologically contaminated cosmetics originated from European countries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.