DSM‐5 personality domains as correlates of non‐suicidal self‐injury severity in an Italian sample of adolescent inpatients with self‐destructive behaviour

Abstract

To evaluate the associations between DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder dysfunctional personality domains and the clinician's ratings tory (CDI). Bivariate association analyses showed that PID-5 negative affectivity scores and CDI total score were significantly associated with CRS-NSSI ratings. PID-5 negative affectivity score proved to be a significant predictor of the CRS-NSSI score even when the effect of the CDI total score was held constant. Our results highlighted that specific risk factors for NSSI severity may be identified even among NSSI adolescents. Method ParticipantsThe initial sample was composed of 102 adolescent inpatients. All subjects who were admitted Antonella Somma et al.

Dissecting pain processing in adolescents with Non‐Suicidal Self Injury: Could suicide risk lurk among the electrodes?

“… 2014 ) and Clinician‐rated severity of non‐suicidal self‐injury (CRS‐NSSI) for NSSI assessment (Somma et al. 2019 ); Child Depression Inventory (CDI) (Kovacs, 1985 ) and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) (Beck et al. 1989 ) for mood characterization; Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 (PID‐5) for personality dimensions assessment (Krueger et al.…”

“…Each NSSI patient was evaluated with the following psychopathological measures, extensively described in previous works: Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI) (Gratz, 2001), Repetitive Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Questionnaire (R-NSSI-Q) (Manca et al 2014) and Clinician-rated severity of non-suicidal self-injury (CRS-NSSI) for NSSI assessment (Somma et al 2019); Child Depression Inventory (CDI) (Kovacs, 1985) and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) (Beck et al 1989) for mood characterization; Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) for personality dimensions assessment (Krueger et al 2012;Somma et al 2019).…”

Clinical utility of the alternative model of personality disorders: A 10th year anniversary review.

“…The search revealed 1,281 studies of interest inclusive of empirical studies, surveys, and clinical case studies, which were considered in relation to their implications for aspects of clinical utility. We excluded AMPD research in areas deemed out of the current review's focus on PDs such as addictive behaviors (Cavicchioli et al, 2020), nonsuicidal self-injury (Somma, Fossati, Ferrara, et al, 2019), trauma disorders (Møller et al, 2021), eating pathology (Solomon-Krakus et al, 2020), and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (Bastiaens et al, 2019). The AMPD's clinical utility will be reviewed with regard to perceived utility for clinical decision-making, learnability, and patient acceptability; the model's ability to capture common features of personality pathology in a clinically informative manner, with particular focus on borderline PD, narcissism, and psychopathy, and its potential utility for informing prognosis, clinical management, and treatment.…”

Viewing Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in Adolescence Through a Developmental Neuroscience Lens: The Impact of Neural Sensitivity to Socioaffective Pain and Reward

“…et al, 2014). Individual differences in temperament also increase risk for NSSI, such as the tendency to act impulsively or engage in risky behaviors when experiencing affective distress (i.e., negative urgency; Chen & Chun, 2019;Lockwood et al, 2020;You, Deng, et al, 2016) or the tendency to experience negative emotions more frequently and with greater intensity (i.e., negative affectivity; Baetens et al, 2011;Chen & Chun, 2019;Gromatsky et al, 2020;Somma et al, 2019;. Female adolescents are also at greater risk of engaging in NSSI, possibly because they report greater levels of negative affect than do male adolescents and are more likely to engage in NSSI when experiencing affective distress (Bakken & Gunter, 2012;Plener et al, 2015;Tatnell et al, 2014;Victor et al, 2018;Xavier et al, 2018).…”