2016
DOI: 10.1177/1087054716629216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DSM-5 and Other Symptom Thresholds for ADHD: Which Is the Best Predictor of Impairment in College Students?

Abstract: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) threshold of five symptoms for ages 17 years and older is not necessarily predictive of ADHD-related impairment in college students and may not be preferable to other thresholds. Options for resolving this diagnostic dilemma are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the Japanese study included a small sample of adults with ADHD ( N = 46), but there were also healthy adults ( N = 104) and university students ( N = 889; Takeda et al, 2016). Note that the WFIRS-S scores of the present study are consistent with those obtained in previous studies that included patients with an established diagnosis of ADHD, suggesting a similar level of ADHD-related functional impairment across cultural contexts (Hartung et al, 2016; LaCount, Hartung, Shelton, Clapp, & Clapp, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Only the Japanese study included a small sample of adults with ADHD ( N = 46), but there were also healthy adults ( N = 104) and university students ( N = 889; Takeda et al, 2016). Note that the WFIRS-S scores of the present study are consistent with those obtained in previous studies that included patients with an established diagnosis of ADHD, suggesting a similar level of ADHD-related functional impairment across cultural contexts (Hartung et al, 2016; LaCount, Hartung, Shelton, Clapp, & Clapp, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As an alternative, the current results, as well as those from recent bi-factor analyses of ADHD symptoms in childhood and a recent study of the dimensionality of ADHD in adulthood (Hartung et al, 2016), provide additional empirical support for a model that would incorporate dimensional modifiers that reflect the number of IN and HI symptoms at the time of assessment (e.g., mild, moderate, and severe for 0–2, 3–5, and 6 or more current symptoms; see Willcutt et al, 2012). Such a model might also encourage research on the developmental course and biobehavioral underpinnings of these presentations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, measures such as the CSS impairment scale, BFIS, modified IRS, and AAQol have empirical support and were all specifically developed to fulfill this purpose. Such measures that are specifically tailored to assess adult ADHD-related impairment seem to be the most appropriate options for researchers and clinicians to meet recent calls for additional focus on the functional impairment criterion (Hartung et al, 2019; Sibley, Pelham, Molina, Gnagy, Waxmonsky, et al, 2012). Unfortunately, each also has its shortcomings that, individually and collectively, signal that the establishment of new, viable alternatives is still a worthy endeavor.…”
Section: Case For Additional Measures Of Impairment In Emerging Adultmentioning
confidence: 99%