2006
DOI: 10.1080/13545700500508262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CUI BONO?THE 1870 BRITISH MARRIED WOMEN'S PROPERTY ACT, BARGAINING POWER, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCES WITHIN MARRIAGE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These sources often allow the identification of women who acted without the assistance and support of male kin, and when integrated with local demographic data give some idea of participation rates within particular sectors and occupations (Hannah Barker 2006;Nicola Phillips 2006;Alison C. Kay 2009;Jennifer Aston 2012;Bernadita Escobar 2012). Wills and probate records also provide insight into women's activity rates (Mary Beth Combs 2006Juanjo Romero-Marin 2006;Angels Solà 2006). Figure 1 summarizes the revised rates presented in the research, including those studies published in Feminist Economics 18(4) and forthcoming volumes.…”
Section: Overcoming Underregistration: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These sources often allow the identification of women who acted without the assistance and support of male kin, and when integrated with local demographic data give some idea of participation rates within particular sectors and occupations (Hannah Barker 2006;Nicola Phillips 2006;Alison C. Kay 2009;Jennifer Aston 2012;Bernadita Escobar 2012). Wills and probate records also provide insight into women's activity rates (Mary Beth Combs 2006Juanjo Romero-Marin 2006;Angels Solà 2006). Figure 1 summarizes the revised rates presented in the research, including those studies published in Feminist Economics 18(4) and forthcoming volumes.…”
Section: Overcoming Underregistration: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, the nature of marital property regimes affects the incentives of men and women in the household to invest in joint or individually controlled assets. For example, Combs (2006) discusses how the Married Women's Property Act in England resulted in women investing in property that they owned. However, legal mandates for gender equity may not necessarily affect the local level if they run counter to traditional norms, unless the state has very strong enforcement capacity.…”
Section: (C) Institutional Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An iconic one in Common Law countries was women's marital status, with both being unmarried or widowed providing facilitating conditions for women's entrepreneurship (Ivy Pinchbeck 1930), 2 perhaps due to the limited scope of the economic rights held by married women in Common Law countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom. The Married Women's Property Acts in the late nineteenth century that strengthened women's economic rights have been 3 Downloaded by [University of Sussex Library] at 05:23 30 June 2016 associated with an increasing presence of women in business (Khan 1996), 3 and a greater share of household property (Mary Beth Combs 2007).…”
Section: Debating Trends In Women's Entepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Despite the relative success of such policies, schooling rates remained relatively low for both genders at the turn of the century. 8 Under Spanish rule and later republican laws, the economic rights of married women in Latin American countries were relatively more generous than those found in Common Law countries (Carmen Diana Deere and Magdalena León 2005;Deere and Doss 2006), at least until the enactment 5 Downloaded by [University of Sussex Library] at 05:23 30 June 2016 of the US and UK Married Women's Property Acts in the 1870s (Khan 1996;Combs 2007). While married women were regarded as non-autonomous economic actors in Hispanic America, just as in Common Law countries, 9 a major difference was that in the former, married women were entitled to 50 percent of marital community property in case the marriage was dissolved due to death, ecclesiastic divorce, or annulment.…”
Section: Women's Entrepreneurship In Late Nineteenth-century Chilementioning
confidence: 99%